Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7381 p774
24/31 December 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Medicines use reviews
· COX-2s
· Registration
· Other professions
· Prescription charges
· CPD
· Fitness to practise


Letters to the Editor

Continuing professional development (CPD)

Where is the Society’s guidance?

From Mrs M. V. Taylor, MRPharmS

I am sure that the majority of pharmacists know that continuing professional development is mandatory. However, what we do not have is specific guidance. I now understand, through attendance at various meetings, that the Royal Pharmaceutical Society expects us to have recorded 12 CPD episodes, of which nine should start at “reflection”. Is this correct and is this guidance or is it mandatory?

I understand that a number of CPD facilitators were appointed by the Society. Are these people still available for advice and support and have they been trained to help pharmacists?

What I would appreciate is clear guidance on what is expected of me regarding CPD and the sooner this is given, the better able committed pharmacists will be to meet the defined criteria. Perhaps this could be a next step for the education division at the Society.

I am also concerned about the process that will be adopted by the Society when it begins to monitor pharmacists’ CPD. I believe it is important that this process is transparent and all pharmacists understand what is expected of them regarding CPD, what they need to do to meet these expectations and how adherence to CPD requirements will be monitored.

I think that if individual pharmacists are not aware of the above, the Society will leave itself open to challenge.

Vanessa Taylor
Eastbourne, East Sussex

 

PETER WILSON, head of post-registration, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, responds:

The requirement to keep continuing professional development records is a professional obligation for all practising pharmacists. Guidance on good CPD practice and the criteria that the Society will use for reviewing pharmacists’ CPD records has been published in the “Plan and record” document. That was sent to all practising pharmacists and is available on the Society’s web site. This is the current position and our guidance is that the average for record keeping is about one record per month. The figure comes from the initial CPD pilots with 500 pharmacists, although we recognise that all pharmacists could make significantly more records than this if they record every learning experience.

The professional requirement for CPD recording will become a legal requirement when the Section 60 order takes effect. We expect this will be during 2006 but it is impossible to be definite about the date since the Order is already significantly later than expected. Implementation of the Order will require an explicit set of rules and standards. These will be published for consultation and members will be able to have their say on standards such as the number and type of records. When we have confirmation of the rules we will be able to communicate with members on expectations and the record review and feedback process. It would be premature to start that now although I agree that the more notice we can give the better.

Although we are not yet in a position to clarify the requirements in the rules, the Society has been making more information and support available to members. CPD facilitators form part of the support package and they work specifically with pharmacists in local branches. They have been trained to use a purpose-designed toolkit of workshops that concentrate on all stages of CPD from initial understanding through recording to peer review of CPD records. The facilitators will be available during 2006.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Prescription charges)
Next Topic (Fitness to practise)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal