Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7382 p22
7 January 2006


Society summary


Watching the Council in action

A few representatives of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's branches are invited to attend each meeting of the Society's Council as observers. Mark Burdon from the Sunderland branch, reports on his experiences as an observer at a recent Council meeting

Further information

Members of the Society who would like to observe the Council at work should make their interest known to their local branch secretary. Branches are invited to send observers on a rotational basis. Information about the local branches is available from Amanda King, membership manager, or Emma Rodriguez, membership officer (e-mail b&ra@rpsgb.org).

The roles of the branches in career promotion and in pharmacy public relations are discussed in the next issue of the twice-yearly Network News, which will be published with The Pharmaceutical Journal next week. it will also include a list of branch meetings planned for the first half of 2006.

In October 2005 I joined four fellow branch observers for a two-day visit to the Society’s London headquarters. My colleagues were Mohammed Ahmed (Doncaster), Clive Goalen (Harrogate), Gerard Scott (Isle of Wight) and Dennis Higgins (Thames Valley). Also there as an observer was the president of the British Pharmaceutical Students Association, Gautam Paul.

Council meetings normally begin at 3.30pm on Tuesday afternoon, following a meeting of the Society’s Officers in the morning. Before the Council meeting began we met Rob Darracott, Director of Corporate and Strategic Development, who explained the agenda for the two days.

Changes

Having been familiar with the old Council chamber I was surprised by the changes that had occurred since my previous visit. Gone were the plush leather seating and dark flock wallpaper; in their place were bland office chairs and plain white walls. This arrangement is a temporary one arising from the increase in the membership of the Council. Accommodation has had to be made for several extra lay members, for two pharmacy technician members and for an academic pharmacist elected to represent the schools of pharmacy. Work on new accommodation for the Council begins in 2006 as part of plans for redevelopment of the basement meeting facilities.

I was particularly interested to see how the new Council would function, following the changes in its structure. It was interesting to watch the political manoeuvres that some new members made, in an attempt to secure their position early in the new regime. I had been sceptical of the benefits of the lay membership but was impressed by the depth of knowledge of pharmacy issues held by some of them. Another satisfying aspect for me personally was the number of Sunderland graduates on the Council, including the President, Hemant Patel.

The meeting proceeded slowly through the public business, which gave the observers a chance to acclimatise. There was much debate on the membership fee structure for 2006, and the Council considered the comments received from members and the letters published in The Pharmaceutical Journal. However, the Council had difficulty in reaching decisions, particularly on the introduction of a reduced fee for long-serving members.

AGM motions

I was particularly pleased by the volume of debate on the motions carried at the 2005 annual general meeting. The motions concerning the formation of a membership committee and a communications committee resulted in a great deal of interest and discussion around the Council chamber. It was agreed that an externally facilitated review of communications be undertaken which will report its findings in 2006.

Observers at Council meetings are excluded from the confidential part of the meeting, so we had a late start to day two. We joined the meeting after the coffee break, only to be asked to leave again within minutes as the meeting moved back to confidential business. This gave us the opportunity to view the Society’s museum displays.

For lunch on day two each branch observer was allocated a designated Council member as a “buddy”. I was paired with Stephen Denyer, head of the Welsh School of Pharmacy and chairman of the Science Committee. Professor Denyer was elected to the Council in 2005 as the academic member.

After lunch, we rejoined the Council for a presentation on the future public health role of pharmacy. The presentation was given by Roger Walker and James McEwen, of Pharmacy Health Link.

The two days provided a fascinating opportunity to observe how the Society runs and I would certainly recommend it to fellow branch members.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal