Home > PJ (current issue) > Onlooker | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7384 p82
21 January 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 42K, Acrobat Reader

Onlooker

O sleep, the certain knot of peace more
Wanderings of an insatiable polymath more
Pets promote health more


O sleep, the certain knot of peace

There is ample evidence that a full night’s sleep is essential to maintain a healthy mind and body. There is, however, a school of thought that maintains that sleep is a luxury sought by the constitutionally lazy individual. Many people are convinced that neglect of proper sleep — sleep of the right quality and at the right time — lies at the root of many of our personal and social problems.

In the 27 October 2005 issue of Nature there is a discussion of sleep, its nature, its demands, the penalty for its neglect and how we should think about it. An editorial comment points out that the notion that successful people can struggle through life with little sleep adds to the misperception that hours spent in sleeping are wasted. There are serious ramifications. The past century has seen a tendency in industrial countries to reduce the time spent asleep by some 20 per cent. In the first place, this trend seriously threatens public safety, particularly through its repercussion on travellers and those given control of machinery. The National Science Foundation in the US has found that more than a third of American car and lorry drivers admit to having dozed off behind the wheel, and oil-tanker navigators denied proper
sleep have caused catastrophic accidents. In general, lack of adequate sleep has been linked to mood swings, mental depression, anxiety and other conditions affecting the thinking process. It is claimed that the medical profession as a whole has been slow to acknowledge the phenomenon, although three quarters of patients seeking help have a problem with sleeping patterns.

Sleep is much more than an absence of activity in the body and brain. Indeed, the brain remains highly active, especially in that part of sleep characterised by rapid eye movements and vivid dreaming. Sleep has many different stages, which take distinct forms. Falling asleep is often conceived as a gradual process but in fact the transition from waking to sleeping can be extremely rapid.

A neural switch in the brain hypothalamus brings about transitions between sleeping and waking, and damage to this region may induce instabilities in both sleeping and waking states.

The question of why we sleep at all has never been satisfactorily answered. It has, obviously, a close connection with the circadian rhythms that do much to regulate our habits. Since older persons sleep about half an hour a night less than younger ones, some of their cognitive decline and increased liability might be attributed to sleep restriction. Sleep loss might also affect adolescents having to rise early to travel at school, as it does overnight truck drivers and some hospital workers.

Consumption of stimulant or depressant drugs at certain times of day, either of necessity or choice, plays an important part in altering sleep patterns and should be taken into account. Even reading a book last thing at night may have remarkable effects.

Meanwhile, we might remember a sonnet of Sir Phillip Sydney (1591) in which he remarks: “Come sleep. O sleep, the certain knot of peace / the baiting place of wit, the balm of woe”. Sleep truly is a wonderful experience.

Back to Top


Wanderings of an insatiable polymath

Thomas YoungIn the 17 November 2005 issue of Nature, Andrew Robinson has commented on the multifarious activities of Thomas Young, an individual who could not resist investigating nearly every scientific question he encountered during his lifetime. His range of interests and his farsightedness have been particularly admired by physicists, physiologists and Egyptologists.

Young was born in Milverton in Somerset in 1773. He studied medicine at London, Edinburgh, Göttingen and Cambridge and started to practise medicine in London in 1860. However, he turned to scientific research and became professor of natural philosophy the year after.

He demonstrated light interference patterns and gave his name to the modulus of elasticity. He explained the accommodation of the eye and the phenomenon of astigmatism, and proposed the three-colour theory of vision, the “Young-Helmholtz theory”, which was not confirmed experimentally until 1959. Meanwhile, he investigated the demotic script on the Rosetta Stone and contributed to Egyptology.
Young was a physician at St George’s Hospital, London. He was foreign secretary of the Royal Society, a scholar of ancient Greek and a linguist regarding the Indo-European family of languages. He was a mathematician, adviser on maritime affairs, and biographer of scientists and mathematicians.

When Young died in 1829, the then president of the Royal Society commented: “His example is only to be followed by those of equal capacity and equal perseverance; and rather recommends the concentration of research within the limits of some defined portion of science than the endeavour to embrace the whole.”

And Young himself wrote: “It is probably best for mankind that the researches of some investigators should be conceived within a narrow compass, while others pass more rapidly through a more extensive sphere of research.”

This is surely a wise piece of advice for would-be polymaths who emulate Young.

Back to Top


Pets promote health

An article in the BMJ of 26 November 2005 commented on important aspects of the keeping of pets in relation to a healthy human lifestyle. It pointed out that the emotional bond between owner and pet can be as intense as that in many human relationships and may confer similar psychological benefits.

Research from the 1980s made popular the view that pet ownership could carry valuable benefits. These included higher survival rates from myocardial infarction, a reduced risk of asthma and allergic rhinitis in children exposed to pet allergens during the first year of life, better physical and psychological health in older people dwelling in the community and a reduced demand for GP services.

Some potential mechanisms have been proposed to explain apparent benefits. Co-_factors involving personality, age and economic or health status may operate. Pet ownership may enhance social interactions and have an indirect affect on wellbeing. And emotional support may reduce the perception of stressful events and protect against anxiety-related illness. Moreover, recovery from serious illness such as stroke, myocardial infarction and cancer may be enhanced.

Whether a person should acquire a pet or continue to own one calls for the balancing of likely benefits and problems. The loss of a pet may distress its owners if the animal was connected with a deceased spouse or was a means of companionship or social contact with other people. It has to be remembered that people do not own pets specifically to enhance their health but for the contribution their pets make to their quality of life from day to day.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal