Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7385 p99
28 January 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


All-round criticism for appliance payment plans

BSIP, Astier/Science Photo Library

Appliances

Choice of appliances, such as stoma care products, may be affected

Department of Health proposals to change a 20-year-old system for paying for medical appliances have been criticised by pharmacy organisations and appliance wholesalers alike.

The Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee says that the proposals risk increasing NHS costs and reducing accessibility and choice for patients.

In a two-stage plan, the DoH wants first to cut and equalise reimbursement to community pharmacies and other contractors that dispense prescriptions for medical appliances. In the longer term, it wants to move to a system of either tendering or reference pricing for service levels (PJ, 29 October 2005, p538).

In its response to a DoH consultation (PDF 210K), the PSNC says that cutting reimbursement to pharmacy contractors — who are already at a financial disadvantage to appliance contractors — will result in pharmacies not supplying appliances, while the smaller number of appliance manufacturers, with vertically integrated supply chains, corner the market. The PSNC advocates changing both reimbursement and remuneration at the same time. It wants a level playing field for both pharmacy and appliance contractors with fixed remuneration rates based on the cost of providing services plus a fair return, as in the new pharmacy contract.

The National Pharmacy Association, too, favours the establishment of service remuneration rates. It says that this will support the principles of the new pharmacy contract and will aid progression from a volume-based system to one that rewards service and quality.

The Company Chemists Association has also rejected the proposed two-stage approach. It favours a system that calculates reimbursement prices from the net acquisition costs incurred by contractors after any discounts. This would require separate discount scales for pharmacies that supply appliances and the vertically integrated appliance contractors.

Dissatisfaction with the proposals is not restricted to pharmacy organisations. Appliance wholesalers have also expressed fears over the possible changes.

Derryck Bond, a director of appliance wholesaler Donald Wardle & Son, said of the planned two-stage approach: “The dramatic reduction in reimbursement for current products could lead to manufacturers squeezing margins to specialist wholesalers who already operate on narrow net margins.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal