Fine art of medical detection
Among the scientists notable for discovering the raison d’être of different diseases Robert Koch must always hold a high rank. Comments
on this
remarkable man, by Howard Markel of the University of Michigan, are published
in the New England Journal of Medicine for 8 December 2005.
In the summer of 1890 the 10th International Medical Congress assembled in Berlin,
attended by some 6,000 physicians. One of them, Robert Koch, who for 14 years
has been professor of hygiene and bacteriology at the University of Berlin, announced
that he had discovered a remedy for tuberculosis. He was cautious in his claim
and did not talk of a “cure”. Nevertheless, within a matter of hours
physicians were demanding supplies of what was called “Koch’s lymph”.
A report of the paper, first published in the German medical press, appeared
in translation in the BMJ on 15 November 1890.
One reader of this account, a young medical practitioner practising in Southsea,
was Arthur Conan Doyle, who had just published a novel entitled ‘A study
in scarlet’, featuring the exploits of one Sherlock Holmes. Doyle was so
excited by the Koch paper that he boarded a train for London with the intention
of going to Germany. He was unable to obtain a ticket to attend a demonstration
by Koch’s colleague Ernst Von Bergmann at Berlin University and failed
to achieve an appointment with Koch, who had been overwhelmed with correspondence
from doctors all over the world and had sacks of mail delivered on his doorstep.
Conan Doyle fared no better when coming across Koch face to face. However, a
Detroit tuberculosis expert, Henry Hartz, met Conan Doyle and shared his lecture
notes with him, obtaining for him admission to patients who had received Koch’s
remedy.
Conan Doyle determined that Koch’s conclusions were premature, and stated
so in a letter to The Daily Telegraph on 20 November 1890. He argued that the
lymph was an excellent aid to diagnosis but that treatment was to be achieved
by other means. Conan Doyle must be given credit for having helped to establish
this fact.
Back to Top
|