Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7388 p215
18 February 2006


Society summary


Practice Committee calls for brand name prescribing for SR opioids

In the interest of patient safety, the Practice Committee of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Council is to press for brand name prescribing of sustained release morphine preparations and opioid patches.

The committee agreed to pursue the matter with the British National Formulary and then take it back to the Council.

At its meeting on 18 January, the committee agreed that it was important for the dosage of morphine and other strong opioids to be carefully titrated to a patient’s individual need because of the fine balance between underdosing and overdosing. In the case of sustained release preparations, this balance could be affected by small but significant differences in release rates between brands.

The committee was concerned that generic prescribing could create confusion for both prescriber and patient. Generic prescribing gave no guarantee that patients would receive the same brand each time they had a prescription dispensed, since community pharmacists often had no way of knowing what had been dispensed previously. This problem has been highlighted by the former chief medical officer at the Department of Health, Jim Smith, in his 2004 report “Building a safer NHS for patients: improving medication safety”, which recommended brand prescribing of oral sustained release preparations.

The committee noted that patients could be confused by a change in the appearance of a prescribed medicine if there was not appropriate counselling. A subsequent failure to take or use the medicine appropriately could have serious consequences. With strong opioids this could lead to unnecessary pain as a result of an underdose or to hospital admission — or even death — as a result of an overdose.

The committee agreed that the issue was particularly significant with opioid patches. Patients often developed a preference for a specific brand. This could be for a variety of reasons, including shape, thickness, colour, type of adhesive, incidence of skin irritation or type of packaging. Inadvertently changing the brand could affect the way patients use the medicine. From a patient safety perspective, patients should have continuity of supply. The committee considered that the issue was particularly important in the case of fentanyl, for which both matrix and reservoir patches are available.

Speaking after the meeting, committee chairman Sid Dajani said: “To improve patient safety, compliance and efficacy, the Society strongly endorses the continuity of supply of the same brand of sustained release morphine preparations and opioid patches for patients and would support the requirement to prescribe these products by brand name.”

He added: “To help identify which brand of sustained release morphine or opioid patch a patient has received, pharmacists should record the brand dispensed in the patient medication record, especially as many prescriptions are currently written generically.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal