Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7389 p232
25 February 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 60K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Oxygen supplies (5)
· Community pharmacy
· Vitamin D
· Care homes
· Boots/UniChem merger
· Locum pharmacy
· Assisted dying
· Methadone
· Statins
· CPD
· Criminal convictions
· Overseas pharmacists
· National boards


Letters to the Editor

Locum pharmacy

Standard operating procedures and self-employed status

From Dr R. J. Schmidt, MRPharmS

I have recently seen advertising literature pronouncing that locum pharmacists who sign up to the standard operating procedures in a particular pharmacy will be treated by the taxman as being employed by that pharmacy. In other words, they will lose self-employed status. The same literature cites the National Pharmacy Association as being the source of this advice. The solution, it seems, is for locum pharmacists to carry with them their own SOPs. Again the NPA is cited as the source of this advice.

If all this really is the advice of the NPA, then I would respectfully suggest that it has been badly advised. This advice does not fit comfortably with my understanding of the nature, origin and purpose of SOPs, or with my understanding of employment law relating to self-employed pharmacists.

First, the act of “signing up” to the SOPs in a pharmacy could, at best, be regarded as one of the tests that the taxman might apply, along with a number of other tests (for example, whether or not the individual holds a key to the premises) to determine whether a individual is employed or self-employed. The reason why this would be a valid test is because employee pharmacists would or should be named on pharmacy SOPs and would or should have been invited to sign them by any employer who understands the nature and purpose of SOPs.

Second, there is no good reason why a locum pharmacist should sign up to a pharmacy SOP. The only “SOP” a locum pharmacist needs to carry around is a copy of the latest edition of “Medicines, ethics and practice — a guide for pharmacists”. The SOPs in a pharmacy then simply need to place an obligation on regular (employed) dispensary staff to monitor the locum pharmacist, drawing his or her attention to any acts or omissions that do not comply with the dispensary SOPs. If the locum pharmacist can demonstrate to the regular staff that their SOP conflicts with the guidance in “MEP”, then this should be sufficient to trigger an urgent review of the SOP. Equally, if the locum pharmacist cannot defend his position, then he will be obliged to change his behaviour, or face dismissal or worse. It is important to remember that we all have a professional and legal duty to react to perceived breaches in standards whether by ourselves or by other pharmacists. If improvements do not occur, these breaches should then be reported to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society or the primary care trust or both. Not to do so is itself professional misconduct whenever patient safety is being put at risk.

It may be adduced from the above that the way forward is simply for dispensary SOPs to include a paragraph that describes how regular employed staff should monitor the behaviour of the locum pharmacist and how they should react to any acts or omissions that conflict with a dispensary SOP. I wrote such a paragraph about a year ago and lodged it with John Murphy at the Pharmacists’ Defence Association with the instruction to pass it on to anyone seeking advice on the subject of locums and SOPs.

Perhaps the NPA would like to clarify its position on this matter?

Richard J. Schmidt
Barnoldswick, Lancashire

 

JOHN D’ARCY, chief executive, National Pharmacy Association, replies:

There has recently been some confusion over the status of locums who sign a pharmacy’s standard operating procedures. Our professional advisers have confirmed that it is not necessarily the case that a locum has to have his or her own set of SOPs to be self-employed. He or she can still be self-employed and adopt a pharmacy’s SOPs provided that he or she is generally engaged on a sessional or daily basis and performs only the statutory requirements of a pharmacist and not those of a manager (such as supervising staff, cashing up and reordering non-pharmacy stock). In using the pharmacy’s SOPs the locum is acting under the general practice guidance on SOPs issued by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Please be aware, however, that this is generic advice and circumstances are subject to change. Information is available on HM Revenue & Customs website

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Boots/UniChem merger)
Next Topic (Assisted dying)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal