Unholy heritage of the Goths and Vandals
A Germanic people, described by Pliny and Tacitus as the Vandili, comprised a group of folk which included the Goths, the Vandals and the Burundians, having their origin in the area now known as Poland. They enjoyed a reputation, even
in those days when violence was more or less expected, of indulging in destructive
habits for no other reason than a delight in destroying what other people had
created.
In about AD200, the Vandals moved south and divided into two groups, the Hasdings
and the Silings, who came into conflict with the Roman Empire, crossing the Rhine
in AD406, where now stands Mainz, and the Pyrenees in AD411. By AD439 they had
captured Carthage and established a kingdom that was eventually crushed by Belisarius,
the general of the Emperor Justinian, in AD533. Despite this suppression, the
Vandals managed to despoil Rome of many works of art in AD455. It was such negative
acts that earned them the reputation in later ages as wanton destroyers.
Today we have to reckon with our own class of vandals, for the most part individuals,
who go about causing apparently senseless damage that affects the rest of society.
People who throw bricks through church windows or who batter or burn memorial
plaques usually seem to lack motive. Some vandals may act under the influence
of drugs — particularly alcohol. It is regrettable that law enforcement
agencies are bent on punishing rather than investigating and explaining why such
things happen, so that their root cause can be revealed.
Some vandalism has strange religious roots and the wanton destruction by the
Taliban of ancient monuments falls within this category. In our own region we
have seen recently the destruction of bronze age menhirs by so-called “born
again” farmers, the setting fire to holed stones and the wanton attacks
on labyrinth designs in a north Cornwall valley, not to mention deliberate alterations
of prehistoric stone arrangements by people who should know better.
Meddling with artefacts of archaeological significance is not to be defended.
As Graham Clark put it in his ‘Archaeology and society’ (1939): “By
helping to develop the historical imagination, the power to stand aside from
one’s own, and to inherit the life of past ages, archaeology nourishes
one of the few faculties peculiar to man, and for this reason alone is worthy
of our special regard.”
Back to Top
|