Involving others in what the Society does
The Royal Pharmaceutical Society has commissioned
three independent consultants to develop a patient and public involvement (PPI) strategy
on its behalf (PJ, 25 February, p246). The Society's President, Hemant
Patel, provides an update on progress

The President: by involving others, the Society can make its business
more transparent and improve quality of work |
Further information
Further information about the Society’s
strategy for patient and public involvement is available from
Eileen Neilson, head of
policy development (e-mail eileen.neilson@rpsgb.org; tel 020 7572
2217). |
In recent years, public cases such as the inquiry into the management
of care of children receiving complex heart surgery at the Bristol Royal
Infirmary1 and the Shipman Inquiry2–6 have
led to growing calls for health care organisations to have closer, more
transparent relationships
with patients and their carers.
The Health and Social Care Act 2001 went one step further and placed
a statutory duty on health authorities, primary care organisations and
NHS trusts to ensure that patients and the public are involved in all
service planning and decision-making. Specifically, Section 11 of the
Act states: “It is the duty of every body to which this section
applies to make arrangements with a view to securing, as respects health
services for which it is responsible, that persons to whom those services
are being or may be provided are, directly or through representatives,
involved in and consulted on (a) the planning of the provision of those
services, (b) the development and consideration of proposals for changes
in the way those services are provided, and (c) decisions to be made
by that body affecting the operation of those services.”
In line with these developments the Royal Pharmaceutical Society is now
drawing up a patient and public involvement strategy with the help of
its three independent consultants — Ros Levenson, Mercy Jeyasingham
and Nikki Joule.
Many pharmacists are already active in engaging their patients and the
public locally, but the Society’s own patient and public involvement
strategy project is taking things a step further and looking at how the
Society itself can involve people — making its business more transparent,
and achieving a better quality of work by involving people from outside
the pharmacy profession wherever it is appropriate and useful to do so.
Our PPI objectives are simple — wherever possible, to involve patients
in the policy decisions of the organisation. We want to create a culture
of collaboration, participative decision-making and partnership. We want
to develop structures in the Society that enable patients and carers
to take an active part in both their own care and the development of
the organisation at every appropriate level. Finally, we want to develop
the profession in a way that reflects the diversity of the communities
that pharmacists serve by consulting and building bridges with these
communities on an ongoing basis.
Stage One
So how is our strategy coming along? Stage One of the Society’s
PPI project, completed in December 2005, scoped the subject, and gathered
information from other regulators and professional bodies and a range
of other relevant organisations. Information was also gathered from discussions
with Society staff and Council sponsors of this project.
A report was submitted to the Council in February 2006, when the Council
noted the importance of ensuring that the pharmacy profession and a wide
range of external stakeholders have the opportunity to comment on the
draft strategy later in the year. Stage Two
In January 2006, Stage Two of the project commenced. The aims of this
part of the project are: · To draw up detailed proposals for the strategy in consultation with
the advisory group, other Society staff, Council sponsors and any other
important external contacts.
· To identify possible models for the PPI strategy, and set out how each
of them would work in relation to the Society’s major areas of
responsibility. The proposals will be discussed by the Council in June
2006.
· To carry out a consultation on these proposals with a wider reference
group (including other pharmacy organisations and groups, patient and
consumer organisations, other regulatory and professional bodies). This
consultation will take place from the beginning of July until early September.
· To analyse and report on the results of this consultation.
· In the light of feedback received from the consultation and any other
relevant information, to draw up a set of final recommendations for the
PPI strategy, for discussion and decision by the Council in December
2006.
Stage Three
Once the PPI strategy has been agreed, stage Three of the project will
focus on implementation, which will be completed by May 2007.
The consultation phase will be particularly useful and the robustness
of the new PPI strategy will be greatly enhanced by effective consultation.
It is essential that the profession is fully involved in this, as well
as enabling a wide range of external stakeholders to have their say.
More information about how to become involved in consultation will be
made available later in the year.
In addition to formal requests for comments, the project group, led by
Eileen Neilson, the Society’s head of policy development, hopes
to invite comments through the Society’s website. Local branch
meetings may also be used for raising awareness of the draft strategy
and encouraging the profession to speak out and influence this important
document.
References
1. Report of the public inquiry into children’s heart surgery at
the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995: learning from Bristol (CM
5207) (The Kennedy report). London: The Stationery Office; 2001.
2. The Shipman Inquiry. First report: Death disguised. London: The Stationery
Office; 2002.
3. The Shipman Inquiry. Second report: The police investigation of March
1998 (CM 5853). London: The Stationery Office; 2003.
4. The Shipman Inquiry. Third report: Death certification and the investigation
of deaths by coroners (CM 5854). London: The Stationery Office; 2003
5. The Shipman Inquiry. Fourth report: The regulation of Controlled Drugs
in the community (CM 6249). London: The Stationery Office; 2004
6. The Shipman Inquiry. Fifth report: Safeguarding patients: lessons
from the past – proposals for the future (CM 6394). London: The
Stationery Office; 2004 |