Home > PJ (current issue) > Original papers

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7393 p348-352
25 March 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 60K, Acrobat Reader

Original papers

Attitudes of successful candidates of supplementary prescribing courses to their training and their extended roles

By Sarah Warchal, David Brown, Mark Tomlin and Jane Portlock


Sarah Warchal, MPharm, is a preregistration pharmacy graduate

David Brown, PhD, MRPharmS, is professor of pharmacy practice

Jane Portlock, PhD, MRPharmS, is postgraduate course leader at the University of Portsmouth School of Pharmacy

Mark Tomlin, MSc, MRPharmS, is critical care pharmacist at Southampton General Hospital.

Correspondence to: David Brown, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, University of Portsmouth, St Michael’s Building, White Swan Road, Portsmouth PO1 2DT

Abstract

Aim
To ascertain whether successfully completing a supplementary prescribing (SP) course can empower pharmacists in terms of their extended roles

Design
Postal questionnaire and telephone interview.

Subjects and setting
38 pharmacist supplementary prescribers, selected by purposive sampling, who completed a supplementary prescribing course in the UK between October 2004 and March 2005.

Outcome measures
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of respondents’ written comments, validated and enriched by telephone interview.

Results
Subjects undertook a course mainly for reasons of personal development and to benefit patients (>80%); most were positive about their course. Overall, subjects emerged from their courses in confident mood to start their new role and were engaged in SP for a wide range of therapeutic areas. A number of barriers to role development were identified, notably in community pharmacy, where time and lack of access to patient medical records were particular problems. A feeling of lack of support was prevalent among primary care trust pharmacists. Hospital pharmacists had written the most SP prescriptions in the previous month and appeared to be facing fewer obstacles. A clear majority (>80%) were in favour of progressing to independent prescribing and allowing greater prescribing powers for other health care professionals.

Conclusions
This study provides evidence that SP qualification can empower practising pharmacists, but that due consideration should be given to providing a supportive environment in which to practise.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal