Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7394 p385
1 April 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Supervision
· Substance misuse
· Classification
· Statins
· Self care
· Oxygen services
· Packaging
· Reciprocity
· Overseas pharmacists
· Council elections
· CPD
· Assisted dying


Letters to the Editor

Council elections

This is no time for reluctance

From Mr D. I. Simpson, FRPharmS

Ray Fitzpatrick and Tony West suggest that there may now be a reluctance to stand in the election for the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s Council (PJ, March 25, p347). With only eight candidates for the available five places this year, they might be right.

It could be that the democratic instincts within the profession have been dulled because over a third of the members of the new Council are appointed rather than elected and only just over half of the Council is elected by pharmacists. If that is the case, it is to be regretted. It is essential that members of the Society are well represented on its governing body. This is especially important today, with the Government about to interfere once more in the way that the Society operates — I am referring to the as yet unknown steps that the Government may take as a result of the as yet unknown contents of the Foster and Donaldson reviews of health regulatory bodies. This is no time for members to be reluctant in coming forward to promote the interests of pharmacists.

As Professor Fitzpatrick and Mr West indicate, there is also another forum where candidates will soon be needed. This will be for the new pharmacy board for England. This is to be set up within the Society to represent the interests of pharmacists working in England. This will be a more democratic body than the Council, with 80 per cent of its number being elected by pharmacists. And, yes, there will be a reserved place for a hospital pharmacist (PJ, February 25, p243); so it is essential that at least one of their number puts his or her name forward.

I was one of only two Council members who attended all of the meetings at which the composition of the English board was discussed and made the initial proposal that it should have sectoral representation. I am pleased to say that this proposal was eventually accepted by the Council as a whole.

Douglas Simpson
Member of Council and Council election candidate
Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Overseas pharmacists)
Next Topic (Continuing professional development)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal