Home > PJ (current issue) > Onlooker | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7395 p424
8 April 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Onlooker

How economics can be the enemy of health care more
Call to halt slaughter of seal pups in Canada more
Initiative to improve the accuracy of science journalism more
Facing the unacceptable / Acme of civilisation more


How economics can be the enemy of health care

A report published in The Lancet for 18 March reveals a singularly grim aspect of the way in which industry, in the interest of its own economic health, can limit the ability of a population to pursue improvements in standards of human health.

When an occupational health expert from the US visited the Peruvian mining town of La Oroya 3,700m up in the Andes to take blood and urine samples from residents, he was faced by hecklers throwing eggs and leaflets opposing his research. The opposition is believed to have been organised by supporters of the town’s major employer, a massive smelting complex, who feared that adverse findings might bring about closure.

Despite the opposition, the visiting team was able to confirm earlier findings of high levels of lead in the blood. They also found high blood levels of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, antimony, caesium and thallium, not only in local citizens but also in a control group living 80km away. In children in particular lead levels exceeded even those found in US adults who work with lead. In La Oroya, nearly all children younger than six, and many older children and adults, have shown blood levels of lead exceeding the World Health Organization limit of 10µg/dl. In the latest study tests were made for 14 different metals in blood and urine, and also in dust and paint samples from participants’ homes.

Faced with the team’s findings, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded that “without reduction of air emissions and remediation of soil, home hygiene and clean neighbourhood campaigns are of little value in decreasing blood lead levels”. It called for an integrated intervention plan to reduce exposure to industrial contaminants in La Oroya.

However, it is recognised that the town’s economy is dependent upon the US-owned smelting business and the companies that do business with it. When attempts are made for improvement, activists claim to have been harassed by insults and even death threats, and parents worried about their children’s health are reluctant to raise their voices. Doctors at the town’s hospital have been discouraged from diagnosing lead poisoning. Moreover, the other toxic metals may increase the lead menace. It is indeed a tricky situation.

Back to Top


Call to halt slaughter of seal pups in Canada

Harp seal pupA comment by Nick Palmer of the UK Parliament’s all-party Animal Welfare Group, published in the 25 March issue of New Scientist, condemns the annual slaughter of some 300,000 pups of the harp seal by Canadian hunters. This is reported to be a brutal procedure involving head crushing, wounded pups being skinned while still alive. Apart from this there are urgent climatic threats to be taken into account.

Ice cover in the Gulf of St Lawrence and the waters north-east of Newfoundland is gravely reduced and it is widely accepted that climate change will soon permanently affect the north-west Atlantic. Seals need to be on ice when giving birth, and if melting occurs before the pups can swim many will drown.

The Canadian authorities responsible for setting quotas for seal culling seem uncertain of their population data. A long-term policy is called for, since it takes 10 to 15 years to assess future prospects, seals not reaching breeding age for five to six years. The current quota of 325,000 to be culled could pose a serious threat to the population.

Other countries are calling on the new Canadian government to end the annual hunt on animal welfare grounds. But they should also consider the conservation issue. The record of fisheries management in the past is not encouraging — witness the collapse of the cod stock on the Atlantic coast of Canada in the early 1990s.

Back to Top


Initiative to improve the accuracy of science journalism

An editorial in the March issue of Chemistry World draws attention to a serious snag affecting communications between scientists and the journalists engaged in explaining their pronouncements to the wider public.

Most inaccurate reports, it is believed, do not stem from the journalist having an axe to grind. They appear more often because the reporting journalist has an insufficient grasp of the topic under consideration and has failed to make contact with the experts who could make the situation clear. Some journalists may not have taken the trouble to contact a scientist who could enlighten them; others, trying desperately to meet a publishing deadline, find that a scientist they might have consulted has not been available at the time of need.

Several organisations are trying to rectify this situation in the interests of accuracy. Among them, the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Royal Society, both of which can produce an expert at need, are joining forces with the Science Media Centre, which was started in response to a House of Lords select committee report on science and society in 2000.

Moreover, the charity Sense about Science last month published a briefing document aimed at lifestyle journalists writing for magazines devoted to supermarket, health and women’s interests. It discussed six of the most prevalent misconceptions regarding chemicals. Among them were that man-made chemicals are inherently dangerous, that it is possible to lead a chemical-free life and that avoiding man-made chemicals brings benefits for the lifestyle. The document goes on to explain the language used by chemists.

Such initiatives are a start but are not considered enough, and much remains to be done. There is a need for more scientists to offer their service in talking to the information media, directly or through a professional body. Employers, universities and learned societies can do something to help. Without them, journalists in a hurry will continue to write withouth the benefit of expert knowledge.

Back to Top


And I quote…

Facing the unacceptable
“To get back to my youth I would do anything in the world, except take exercise, get up early, or be respectable”
— Oscar Wilde, “The Picture of Dorian Gray” (1891).

Acme of civilisation
“To be able to fill leisure intelligently is the last product of civilisation,”
— Bertrand Russell: ‘The conquest of happiness’ (1930).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal