Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7395 p408
8 April 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Few opportunities for pharmacists in GMS contract

GPs' practice could be influenced by prescribing guidance

GPs' practice could be influenced by prescribing guidance

Few tangible opportunities for pharmacists exist within the revised general medical services (GMS) contract for 2006–07, which came into effect this week.

The new GMS contract includes additional clinical areas that will be included in the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) incentive scheme, such as dementia, depression, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, obesity and learning disabilities.

Sue Carter, head of prescribing and pharmacy at Adur, Arun & Worthing Teaching Primary Care Trust, said that although there may not be many directly remunerable opportunities for pharmacists, community pharmacists and PCT pharmacists may be able to use their knowledge of medicines to influence and build relationships with GPs by helping them meet their QOF aims.

“If pharmacists show that they are aware of the GMS contract and can contribute in some way to its implementation, then there may be opportunities for pharmacy that come out of it,” explained Mrs Carter.

Good news for pharmacists is that the GMS contract now includes guidance on performing medication reviews. Mrs Carter said that for two years GPs have had medication review as part of their contract but without any formal guidance on how those reviews should be done. “For the first time, GPs are being shown in the GMS guidance all aspects of a medication review,” she said.

It is expected that at least a level 2 medication review will occur, which is undertaken in a systematic way by a competent person. “Pharmacists have very good skills in this area and therefore [there are] good opportunities,” said Mrs Carter.

Guidance on excessive or inappropriate prescribing has also been published, which could have implications for pharmacists who are prescribers or are working with prescribers. “Community pharmacists or PCT pharmacists can use this guidance in a constructive, positive way to help influence prescribing,” Mrs Carter said. “It gives added substance to what is already happening.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal