Pharmacists charged in price-fixing case
Pharmacists working as directors of Goldshield Group Plc were due to be charged with conspiracy to defraud the NHS this week following a four-year investigation by the Serious Fraud Office. In a statement,
the SFO confirmed that criminal proceedings are being brought against nine individuals
and five companies. The announcement follows an investigation into the
activities of several suppliers suspected of conspiring to defraud the
NHS through prices charged for penicillin-based antibiotics and warfarin
between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2000.
The pharmacists are Ajit Ramanlal Patel and Kirti Vinubhai Patel. Other
individuals due to be charged are Denis William O’Neill and John
Stephen Clark, of Kent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Jonathan Raymond Close and
Nicholas Mark Foster, formerly of Norton Healthcare Ltd, Luma Auchi,
formerly of Regent-GM Laboratories Ltd, Michael John Frederick Sparrow,
formerly of Generics (UK) Ltd and Anil Kumar Sharma, formerly of Ranbaxy
(UK) Ltd. The SFO would not say whether any of these individuals were
pharmacists.
Summonses have also been issued upon Kent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Norton
Healthcare Ltd, Generics (UK) Ltd, Ranbaxy (UK) Ltd and Goldshield Group
Plc.
SFO assistant director Philip Lewis said: “This important case
involving an allegation of dishonest price fixing by companies is likely
to have a significant impact upon the business culture of this country.”
In a separate statement, the Department of Health announced that Norton
Healthcare Ltd, Norton Pharmaceuticals Ltd and the DoH have settled civil
claims brought against Norton for alleged anti-competitive cartel conduct
in connection with the supply of generic drugs to the NHS.
Under the terms of the settlement Norton has agreed to compensate the
NHS by paying £13.5m and to co-operate in connection with the continuing
claims regarding the alleged price-fixing arrangements.
Jim Gee, director of counter fraud services at the DoH, said: “Norton
is the third of the defendant companies to have recognised the strength
of the claim made by the NHS and to have decided to act in the public
interest.” |