Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7396 p441
15 April 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· PSNC
· Antibiotics
· Packaging
· Medicines use reviews
· Smoking cessation
· Statistics
· Statins
· Drug misuse
· Agenda for Change
· Palliative care
· The Society (2)


Letters to the Editor

Statins

Pharmacists need to see through the spin

From Mr C. F. Brewer, MRPharmS

Although I welcome Jim Smith’s contribution to the debate on primary prevention with statins (PJ, 1 April, p382), I am left feeling that he did not actually acknowledge any of the issues raised by my Broad spectrum piece (PJ, 11 March, p290).

Pharmacists are aware of the benefits of statins; we cannot open a newspaper without learning about the latest breakthrough. What we do not need is spin. I was disappointed with the way in which Professor Smith quoted some impressive statistics while omitting to mention any of the less favourable findings from the same study.

The meta-analysis commissioned by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence did produce myocardial-infarction reduction figures that were of (borderline) statistical significance.1 However, the same analysis found that there was no significant decrease in total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, coronary heart disease mortality, stroke mortality, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina and revascularisation. These were surely equally important findings and may indicate that we need to do more research before we start expecting 3.3 million healthy people to change their lifestyle.

The Canadian analysis cited by Professor Smith uses the simple expedient of extrapolating a small treatment benefit to a large population, making the number of lives saved look positively heroic.2 Had the analysis been performed in China, the figures would look even better. These types of headline statistics are of no relevance to those of us who treat one patient at a time.

Professor Smith unwittingly reinforces my message that a gulf exists between the objectives of the health establishment and the health care needs of real people. Our patients are capable of making informed choices, provided they are given relevant information in a form they can understand.

Chris Brewer
Medicines Information Pharmacist
North Cumbria Acute Hospitals NHS Trust


References

1. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Cardiovascular disease — statins. Technology Appraisal 94. London: NICE; 2006.

2. Manuel DG, Lim J, Tanuseputro P. Revisiting rose: strategies for reducing coronary heart disease. BMJ 2006;332:659–62.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Statistics)
Next Topic (Drug misuse)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal