| · Agenda for Change
· Independent prescribing
· Emergency contraception
· Statistics (2)
· Medicines use reviews (2)
· Section 60 Order
· Education
· The Society
Letters to the Editor
|
Education
Effects of dumbing down of examinations results
From Mr J. D. Thomas, MRPharmS
The difficulties experienced by community pharmacists, as often expressed
in these columns, with postgraduate students’ lack of elementary
mathematical, pharmaceutical and communication skills may now have been
explained by the revelations about De Montfort University and the acknowledgement
in the media (by a landmark ruling under the Freedom of Information Act)
that pass marks have been lowered to 26 per cent in some modules, one
of which was mathematics. It appears to me that scores of first-year
pharmacy students’ examination results may have been manipulated
to save embarrassment that the students were not up to the rigours of
the pharmacy training programme.
How many hundreds of others in past years have also received similar
inflated results?
The external examiners told De Montfort University in Leicester that
its action of upgrading was both improper and deplorable. In response,
the Royal Pharmaceutical Society merely issued a bland statement that
this pharmacy course is on probation and being monitored
by a five-point action plan (PJ, 29 April, p493). In my opinion, this is hardly the action
to satisfy the public perception that half of new pharmacy graduates
may not be up to the required standard.
As pharmacy’s regulatory body, our Society must be seen to be proactive.
If there had been a comparable incident in community pharmacy, the hounds
of the inspectorate would have, rightly, been out persecuting and prosecuting.
If the head of any school of pharmacy believes that the intake of students
lacks the calibre to meet the required standard, then it is the school’s
selection process that is at fault, and the remedy for this is in its
own hands. Heads also state that pharmacy courses are over prescribed,
so there should be little difficulty in recruiting suitably qualified
students.
Once again, in the present climate of dumbing down examination results,
it is the poor hard-working student who is being abused.
Let us hope that our Society will ensure that pharmacy will be an exception
and be a leading light and ensure that excellence is paramount for the
safety of medicines and public.
David Thomas
Patshull,
Shropshire
|