Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7399 p526
6 May 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Doctors warned on “shared premises” risk

Concerns voiced by the Irish Pharmaceutical Union over the rapid development in the republic of one-stop health centres, with GP surgery and pharmacy on the same premises, have been echoed by the medical profession's ruling body.

In a warning to doctors, the Irish Medical Council said that, although shared premises might be convenient for patients, the arrangement had “potential for abuse”. There was the risk that a pharmacist’s stocking policies could influence the GP’s prescribing patterns, or that the GP would refer patients to the pharmacist, or that the pharmacy would use the presence of the surgery to endorse its premises.

The council reminded GPs of their ethical obligation “to provide clinical care independent of commercial interest”, and warned that any member suspected of behaving otherwise would face a fitness-to-practise inquiry. The council president, John Hillery, added that although sharing premises with a pharmacy was not forbidden, members should be alert to the potential pitfalls involved.

But Karl Hilton, president of the Irish Pharmaceutical Union, claimed that “such an important issue for patients” required a stronger response. “There should be no business relationship of any kind between a doctor and a pharmacist, and the Shipman report emphasised that point,” he said.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal