| · Intervention recording
· Packaging
· National Health Service
· Remote supervision
· Council election
· Fitness to practise (3)
· Education
Letters to the Editor
|
National Health Service
Discrimination or exacting identification standards?
From Ms H. B. Hawley, MRPharmS
I would like to remind my female married colleagues that they will need
to have their marriage certificate ready for inspection by primary care
trusts before their new electronic prescription service smart card can
be issued (even if they have never used their husband’s name socially
or professionally).
My male colleagues can relax safe in the knowledge that this indignity
will not be inflicted on them.
Discrimination? I think so.
Brigitte Hawley
Cranbrook, Kent
| |
PHILIP BROWN, senior responsible owner, Registration Authority, Department
of Health, replies:
A user of the NHS Care Records Service is able to
appear in the user register in any name that he or she is entitled
to use, but they have to establish this identity to a governmental standard,
e-GIF (e-Government Interoperability Framework) level 3.
If a married woman uses her maiden name professionally then that is
the identity she has to prove; part of the proof involves verifying “place in the community” — an
address — and this is often via utility bills. If those utility bills
are in the married name then a marriage certificate may be required to demonstrate
that maiden name and married name are associated.
In any situation where the proofs of identity are in different names, evidence
is required to connect them. The intention is to ensure that women have the
necessary flexibility in registering but, quite properly, the identification
standards
for people about to access confidential patient data are exacting. |
|