Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7401 p605
20 May 2006


Society summary


Pharmacists’ views captured in Society’s 2005 Annual Review

Annual Review 2005The opinions of a diverse range of pharmacists on the role of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society have been captured in the organisation's 2005 Annual Review. The review has been distributed to members and is also available to download from the Society's website (PDF 2.8MB)

The publication includes the views of a range of people within the profession, including community pharmacists, hospital pharmacists (including a consultant pharmacist), a veterinary pharmacist, a senior pharmacist within a large pharmaceutical company, an academic pharmacist, a pharmacy technician and a pharmacist working within a primary care organisation. A pharmacy technician is also featured.

Each one was asked for their views on the role of the Society, whether they believed the Society was important to their working lives and whether or not they believed they benefited from membership.

Commenting on the 2005 Review the Society’s President, Hemant Patel, said: “This year’s review is very member-focused and the views expressed by such a wide range of pharmacists about the Society were very encouraging. For me, personally, 2005 has been about the progress the pharmacy profession has made towards meeting its own aspirations while serving patients and the public. This year’s review not only highlights the work the Society has undertaken to realise and move forward with its vision for the future of pharmacy, but also the people in a wide range of practice areas who are making this vision a reality.”

Along with the Society’s financial statements for 2005, the Annual Review will be presented at the Society’s AGM on Wednesday 24 May, which takes place at the Westminster Suite, Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, Broad Sanctuary, London SW1, at 7.30pm (see Official Notice on p609).

The Society’s full financial statements for 2005 are available on the Society’s website (PDF 1.5MB).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal