Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7402 p613
27 May 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Community pharmacy may no longer be a family-friendly career

Some female community pharmacists face difficulties meeting domestic commitments owing to long working hours, supervisory requirements and staffing problems, according to research presented at the Pharmacy Practice Research Trust's biennial awards seminar in London earlier this month.

Wendy Gidman, a PhD student at the University of Manchester, presented her two-year project, which looked at the factors that motivate working practices in female community pharmacists over the age of 30 years.

Dr Gidman found that, despite the common assumption that community pharmacy is a flexible and family-friendly sector to work in, many of the pharmacists she interviewed had moved to primary care trust jobs because the pressure in community pharmacy was too high.

Dr Gidman conducted qualitative interviews with a sample of 30 community pharmacists from 12 primary care trusts in the north-west of England. Most were white British and a high proportion were employed by multiples or supermarkets.

Dr Gidman said: “More than half of the cases I looked at showed difficulties in terms of long hours and year-round staffing, which sometimes meant people couldn’t take annual leave. Over the past decade, the volume of prescriptions has increased by 50 per cent and is increasing by 8 per cent year-on-year, but the workforce has remained static, putting increased pressure on the pharmacists. In extreme cases child care issues, such as incompatible nursery times, have meant some women pharmacists are pushed into low paid employment to meet lifestyle and domestic commitments, while others have had to give up working in the profession altogether.”

A year after conducting the interviews, Dr Gidman quantified and categorised the opinions of a further sample of 40 pharmacists (10 of whom participated in stage 1). Preliminary findings suggest that provision of additional services under the new contract without an increase in staff numbers is a further source of pressure on pharmacists.

Dr Gidman’s research was funded through a Sir Hugh Linstead Fellowship from the Pharmacy Practice Research Trust.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal