Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7404 p679
10 June 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Education (2)
· NHS funding
· Complementary medicine
· Electronic prescribing
· The profession
· Women in politics
· Packaging design
· Statutory Committee
· Annual general meeting
· Council expenses
· Regulation
· Section 60 Order
· Council election


Letters to the Editor

Section 60 Order

Time the Society gave up regulation

From Mr A. Matalia, MRPharmS

Pharmacists should respond to the Section 60 consultation direct to the Department of Health as their individual views are as important as the official response of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.

Are pharmacists fed up with poor representation, much lower salaries than opticians, and doctors, yet seemingly harsher professional standards?

If so, it is time to act. Consider the benefits of registration of pharmacists, indeed all health care professionals, under a single body — the Healthcare Professionals Council. We would get much lower registration fees (pharmacists currently pay £267 per year, optometrists £169 per year and nurses £129 every three years) , a one-point contact for checking registration of all health care professionals and national accountability to one body. Consistency in standards, discipline and punishment applicable to all workers would follow. Under a single regulatory body, every healthcare worker would be treated equally.

It is time to recognise that self-regulation does not work, is outdated and expensive.

I urge all pharmacists to write direct to the Department of Health and recommend that the regulatory functions of the Society be transferred to the Healthcare Professionals Council. Pharmacists should be designated a new title: perhaps SRP (State Registered Pharmacist). In fact, they should recommend that the HPC becomes the single regulator of all health care workers, and that self-regulation comes to an end.

The Society could then become an organisation to promote the interests of pharmacy, with voluntary membership and those who value the designation MRPharmS can pay the required fee while others could be liberated and be able to practise their profession.

Amit Matalia
Coventry, West Midlands

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Regulation)
Next Topic (Council election)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal