Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7404 p699
10 June 2006


Society summary


High standards sought in doctor dispensing

The Society should take steps to ensure equally high standards of dispensing in pharmacies and in dispensing medical practices, the branch representatives' meeting decided.

Peter Hopley (Northumbrian) moved: “That the Society should approach the medical profession with the aim of ensuring good practice in rural areas through collaboration between the professions, to promote and attain equally high standards for the dispensing of medicines to patients in the community.” He said that the pharmacy profession was making little effort to address the issue. It should take the opportunity now while the GP contract is new and VAT regulations are affecting doctors. It should propose to the medical profession radical new measures that offer positive solutions to these problems.

Professional supervision should be defined so that doctors and pharmacists work to the same standard. Community pharmacists should be encouraged to participate in the training of their local doctors’ dispensing staff, perhaps providing work experience and pharmaceutical supervision to supplement distance learning courses. Full co-operation could see local pharmacists acting as advisers to doctors, and perhaps having responsibility for the dispensary operational policies, purchasing decisions, staff training and clinical governance. There was also a need for better and more formal expression of patient choice. Finally, where pharmacists dispense to patients in remote rural areas, they need additional support. New, radical and positive measures such as these should be firmly put to the medical profession in a spirit of co-operation.

Timothy Billings (South East Metropolitan) said that the issue is not confined to rural areas. London has a large number of dispensing medical practices in the independent sector. He suggested the removal from the motion of the words “in rural areas”.

The proposer accepted the amendment and the amended motion was then carried without further debate.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal