Home > PJ (Current issue) > Meetings | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 276 No 7405 p723-724
17 June 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Meetings

See Reports

European Society of Clinical Pharmacy

Over 600 delegates attended this year's European Society of Clinical Pharmacy spring conference to share research and discuss good practice. The theme of the meeting was the role of the pharmacist in chronic disease management. Hannah Pike reports

The 6th European Society of Clinical Pharmacy spring conference took place in Vilnius, Lithuania on 25–27 May. Hannah Pike is editor of Hospital Pharmacist

Sharing good practice among nations

Early experiences of UK supplementary prescribers

Paediatric medicine issues in the 21st century

Education benefits TB patients

An Australian study of CVS pharmacists

Sharing good practice among nations

Suzete Costa

Suzete Costa: guidelines designed for adaption and translation

Achieving optimal control of hypertension, through more active involvement of pharmacists, is the aim of the pharmacy-based hypertension management project. This is one of six intervention projects developed within the EuroPharm Forum, a joint network between national pharmaceutical associations and the World Health Organization regional office for Europe.

Suzete Costa from Portugal, task force manager of the project, described how the forum aims to make the best use of community pharmacists through the development of guidelines and model programmes. The guidelines are intended to be adapted and translated to suit the working practices of individual countries.

The pharmacy-based hypertension management project started in 1996 and in 2001 a pilot programme was undertaken in six European countries. Ms Costa described how the guidelines outline ways in which pharmacists can provide a hypertension management service at three levels of intervention:

· Level 1, prevention Involves counselling patients about risk factors.

· Level 2, detection Involves screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors, including high blood pressure.

· Level 3, management Includes blood pressure measurement, reinforcing compliance and advice on medicines and lifestyle.

The guidelines include tools for pharmacists to adopt or adapt, based on models collected from other countries. For example, one tool is a patient profile sheet onto which the pharmacist can record details such as the patient’s weight, blood pressure, referrals and date of next visit.

The protocol and guidelines for the hypertension project, which have recently been approved by the WHO regional office for Europe, are available online

Ms Costa summarised pharmacist-based hypertension projects in other countries based on reports sent to the forum. For example, in the Czech Republic interactive pharmacist training courses about patient medication records are taking place; Hungary and Poland have used the forum’s model to develop their own hypertension programme; and, in the UK, point-of-care testing forms part of the new community pharmacy contract.


Early experiences of UK supplementary prescribers

GP and patient feedback of supplementary prescribing

UK pharmacist supplementary prescriber Fiona Reid gave delegates an update on the development and implementation of pharmacist prescribing in the UK. She described the results from a patient and GP survey conducted in the pharmacist-led heart failure and cardiovascular risk clinics she runs in primary care.

Questionnaires were sent to 201 patients, with a response rate of 74 per cent. When asked whom they would prefer to manage their hypertension, 88 patients (61 per cent) chose the pharmacist, 50 patients (35 per cent) did not mind and six patients (4 per cent) preferred their treatment to be managed by a doctor.

Feedback from GPs (obtained from interviews) included comments that their workload was reduced, that pharmacist prescribing has improved the continuity of patient care, that treatment managed by the pharmacist is quicker and more aggressive, and that pharmacists were more likely than GPs to follow protocols and guidelines.

Early experiences of pharmacist supplementary prescribers in the UK have been positive and good progress is being made, Derek Stewart, senior lecturer at the Robert Gordon University School of Pharmacy, Aberdeen, told delegates.

Dr Stewart described the results of the first national study of supplementary prescribers, in which a questionnaire was sent to supplementary prescribers registered with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (n=518) exploring satisfaction with the training course, subsequent prescribing activity and perceived benefits and challenges of being a supplementary prescriber.

Over 80 per cent of subjects responded to the questionnaire, the majority of whom had been registered pharmacists for less than 20 years.

Feedback on the training courses was positive. On a scale of 1–5 (where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree) a median score of 4 was obtained for the following statements: the course fully met my expectations and needs; I feel confident in my ability as a supplementary prescriber; being a supplementary prescriber has been/will be a major change to my day-to-day practice.

The results showed that 48.6 per cent of respondents were practising supplementary prescribers, 79 per cent had written at least one prescription and, of these, 87.7 per cent had performed a full medicines use review.

The main perceived benefit of supplementary prescribing was better patient management, followed by job satisfaction. Of those who identified challenges in delivering supplementary prescribing (n=127), the issues raised were inadequate funding (21.3 per cent), the referral process/identification of suitable patients (15 per cent), poor recognition of the pharmacist’s role by other professionals (15 per cent), inadequate IT support (14.2 per cent) and inadequate administrative support (3.9 per cent).

Pharmacists who were not practising supplementary prescribing (n=205), gave reasons including lack of organisational recognition, lack of funding, non-availability of prescription pads and a change of job.

Dr Stewart said that supplementary prescribers need further support in terms of infrastructure and integration into the health care team, and that further outcomes-based research is warranted.

The research was carried out at Robert Gordon University in collaboration with the University of Aberdeen and NHS Education for Scotland.


Paediatric medicine issues in the 21st century

Up to 65 per cent of prescriptions written in children’s hospitals are for medicines unlicensed for paediatric use or are being used “off label”, Tony Nunn, clinical director of pharmacy at Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospitals NHS trust told delegates. He described the problems caused by not having appropriate drug formulations for children, including the difficulties and risks of extemporaneous dispensing and importing formulations from other countries.

Mr Nunn described the new proposed European Commission regulation to encourage pharmaceutical companies to develop medicines for children, which is due for its second reading in the European parliament later this year. He explained the role of the new paediatric committee at the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products in considering the benefit of carrying out studies in children, and described the different types of rewards and incentives that will be granted to companies who study medicines in children. The regulation is likely to become law by end of 2006, Mr Nunn said.

He went on to outline other work being done at a European level, including the establishment of an inventory of medicines used in children to help identify research priorities, and a database of trials and authorised products across Europe. However, he posed the question of whether Europe has the infrastructure in place to be ready for this kind of research.

Interest in the BNF for Children from other countries has also triggered the suggestion that it is time to consider a European formulary for children, he said.

Antje Neubert

Antje Neubert: improving taste of drugs

Antje Neubert, from the University of London School of Pharmacy, described research into oral formulation and taste. Children find it harder than adults to recognise different tastes, she explained, so unusual flavours should be avoided for better acceptability. Social and cultural influences also affect taste preferences. For example, research has shown that American children prefer bubblegum and grape flavours, European children prefer citrus and red berry flavours, and Japanese children prefer less sweet formulations. She described methods used to assess taste including a taste panel and an electronic tongue, which analyses the electric charge caused by the substance and compares it to taste standards.
Dr Neubert also outlined work from the Task Force in Europe for Drug Development for the Young (TEDDY), a network of excellence for children funded by the EU Commission involving 17 research institutions from 11 countries, of which she is deputy UK co-ordinator. They aim to promote research on safe use of medicines for children and improve the use of current drugs. Topics covered include rare diseases, pharmacovigilance, paediatric databases and ethical issues.


Education benefits TB patients

Clinical pharmacists can play a key role in the provision of pharmaceutical care and education for patients with tuberculosis, Philip Martin Clark, pharmacy tutor at Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey, explained. He presented research undertaken at Marmara University into TB education and adherence to drug regimens, pharmaceutical care, quality of life and evaluation of new drugs.

In one of the studies the impact of oral and written education tools on compliance with drug therapy was assessed. Patients who were provided with pharmacist-directed education about their medicines showed better adherence to drug regimens that those receiving standard care. Patients were given illustrated educational material (in a question and answer format) or standard care, and adherence was measured by recording attendance at scheduled clinic visits, urine analysis for isoniazid (INH) metabolites and pill counting. The results showed that the educated group were more likely to attend — 30 out of 56 patients (53.6 per cent) attended 100 per cent of their scheduled appointments in the educated group compared with 17/58 (29.3 per cent) in the routine group. Positive results for all INH tests were recorded for 41/51 (80.4 per cent) patients in the intervention group compared with 22/52 (42.3 per cent) in the routine group, and consumption of prescribed medicines was also found to be higher in the educated group.

Dr Clark described a number of other issues that pharmacists should be aware of when writing pharmaceutical care plans and forming strategies to provide care for patients with TB. These include pain control, nutrition, appropriate prescribing, respiratory control and diabetic control.

Patient beliefs about their medicines correlate with adherence

Patient adherence to drug regimens involving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is correlated with their perceived benefit of the drugs. Marcel Bouvy from the SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, the Netherlands, presented a study undertaken in 11 community pharmacies in the Netherlands into the perceived necessity and concerns about inhaled corticosteroid use in asthma. A “beliefs about medicines” questionnaire (BMQ) was sent to 458 patients using ICS and returned by 238. Results were compared with adherence as measured from pharmacy dispensing data and patient self-reporting.

A moderate correlation was seen between perceived benefit and patient adherence to treatment. Dr Bouvy concluded that the BMQ is a useful tool to assess patient attitudes in combination with medical and clinical records and is reasonably predictive of adherence, so can assist in understanding barriers to use of the drugs. However, it does not fully explain all causes of non-compliance.


An Australian study of CVS pharmacists

Establishing the role of a specialist cardiovascular pharmacist in multidisciplinary health care teams optimises medicines use in chronic heart disease sufferers. This was the finding of a team from the Universities of Sydney and New South Wales, Australia.

Alexandra Bennett, from the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, described how the specialist pharmacist role has been developed in three settings: an outpatient heart failure clinic, a community heart failure service and a cardiac rehabilitation programme associated with a major teaching hospital. The role of the pharmacist included informing patients about their medicines, self-care strategies, attending multidisciplinary team meetings, performing individual consultations and visiting patients in their home where necessary.

Ms Bennett described how this role has improved patient care and, although hospital based, aims to bridge the gap between primary and secondary care. She said that the service could be expanded to other disciplines and other hospitals.

Other data from this study showed that the number of medicines taken by a cardiac patient is a strong predictor for heart failure readmission. For each additional medicine added to a patient’s drug regimen, the risk of readmission in six months post discharge doubled (odds ratio 2.055, 95 per cent CI 1.477–2.858).


©The Pharmaceutical Journal