Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7407 p12
1 July 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· NHS
· POM-to-P switches
· NHS IT
· Statutory Committee (2)
· Onlooker (2)


Letters to the Editor

Onlooker

Chronic fatigue syndrome is not the same as ME (Mrs A. Bridges)

Almost invariably! (Mr A. D Asher)

Chronic fatigue syndrome is not the same as ME

From Mrs A. Bridges, RegPharmTech

Onlooker’s article on chronic fatigue syndrome (PJ, 10 June, p688) does not make clear that chronic fatigue is not the same illness as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME).

Malcolm Hooper of the University of Sunderland says that the treatment (or lack of it) of ME sufferers in the UK is a national scandal. In a synopsis of the problem for the ongoing UK Parliamentary Inquiry into the illness he says that it is time that the school of psychiatrists who perpetuate the myth that ME is a “non-disease” are held publicly accountable.

ME has been well-documented in medical literature for over 60 years. It was extensively documented and named by Melvin Ramsay, honorary consultant physician at the infectious diseases department of the Royal Free Hospital, for many years. He was the clinician at that hospital when a mass outbreak occurred there exactly 50 years ago. Before his death Dr Ramsay, echoing the sentiments of Professor Hooper, wrote: “The too facile assumption that such an entity — despite a long series of cases extending over several decades — can be attributed to psychological stress is simply untenable.”

ME has been recognised and classified as a serious neurological disorder by the World Health Organization since 1969.

Professor Hooper points out that most experienced ME clinicians accept that some degree of encephalitis has occurred in patients with ME leading to damage of the brain stem. In ME there is evidence of disruption in ion channels in the cell membranes; such changes in ion channel function offer a rational basis to explain the fluctuating symptoms experienced by ME sufferers. Such ion channel changes are known to be induced by physical activities, stress and fasting and these ion channel abnormalities in the myocardium may form the basis of cardiac dysfunction in ME.

It is also the case that some enteroviruses are recognised as being implicated in ME and are known to damage the heart muscle, while Vance Spence, of Dundee University, has proved that free radical damage in the endothelium can adversely affect all major organs. These separate studies show how multi-organ damage occurs in patients with ME.

Some 240,000 people in the UK are thought to suffer with ME, a quarter of them severely. It is hard to know for certain though, because there is no Department of Health agreed rigorous diagnostic criteria and the DoH refuses to collate statistics.

Cognitive behavioural therapy and graded exercise may benefit those who are suffering from simple chronic fatigue but these are nothing more than glorified coping strategies. For those who have neurological ME these strategies can be positively harmful.

Annette Bridges
Derby


Almost invariably!

From Mr A. D Asher, MRPharmS

Onlooker wrote (PJ, 17 June, p726) that “politicians almost invariably try to drive home a point of view”. “Invariably” is an absolute and as such cannot be “almost”. The term “almost invariably” is a tautological inexactitude and is to be deprecated.

In view of Onlooker’s more recent musings about the importance of the correct use of the language (PJ, 24 June, p764), it is, more than ever, vital that he himself be careful with the use of our rich and valuable native language. Indeed, in the body of his piece he points up the errors of “fairly unique” and “almost identical”. He gets it right almost invariably but not, it would appear, invariably.

Allan D. Asher
London

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Statutory Committee)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal