| · Control of entry
· Controlled drugs
· Medicines use review
· Homoeopathy
Letters to the Editor
|
Medicines use review
A travesty?
From “Concerned Pharmacist”
Last year we were told that a medicines use review should take no longer
than 10 minutes, a target that I often fail to achieve. A recent company
newsletter from Lloydspharmacy stated: “Questions like ‘are
you having problems with opening child-resistant containers’ opens
up an easy conversation that can be documented and counted as an MUR.”
Am I the only pharmacist who feels uneasy with classifying such normal “best
practice” as an MUR? At best this is a travesty of an MUR’s
original purpose and at worst might be considered to be a fraudulent
claim for NHS fees.
Concerned Pharmacist
298/1
| |
ANDY MURDOCK, pharmacy director, Lloydspharmacy, replies:
After reviewing
the newsletter mentioned I think that there is a slight misunderstanding
of the interpretation. A recent audit that we have undertaken has
highlighted several barriers pharmacists and staff have when undertaking
MURs. One
of these is the engagement with potential MUR patients to introduce
and explain the service. As part of our ongoing attempts to help our
pharmacists
and staff overcome these barriers we identify ideas from “best” performing
pharmacies and the idea mentioned would be no more than an “ice
breaker” to initiate a conversation to help assess whether or
not the particular patient would benefit from an MUR. We have issued
much
more detailed and significant guidance around specific conditions that
does not trivialise or play down the importance we attach to providing
a proper and appropriate MUR service. |
|