Home > PJ (current issue) > Onlooker | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7408 p58
8 July 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Onlooker

Coping with panic disorder more
Survival may turn on faculty of foresight more
Arguments continue over our dwarf ancesters from Indonesia more


Coping with panic disorder

For our classical ancestors Pan was a deity calling for respect. He was supposed to be the son of Hermes, but there is no agreement over the name of his mother. His name means “guardian of flocks”. Half man, half goat, he lurked in forests and on the hills, making an occasional appearance that scared humans taken unawares — hence the name panic given to sudden and unanticipated fits of acute anxiety.

Panic disorder is an extreme manifestation of the anxiety state. It involves recurrent attacks of intense fear and discomfort, lasting usually only a few minutes but on rare occasions for hours. Their onset is unexpected and may be associated with a phobia such as discomfort in a supermarket or in a crowd of any kind. Once a sufferer associates certain situations with severe discomfort further attacks of panic may be foreseen thus rendering the mental state worse.

Symptoms that may arise include shortness of breath, palpitations with accelerated heart rate, chest pain, choking or smothering sensations, dizziness and faintness. The patient may express a fear of dying, going crazy or of launching into uncontrollable actions.

Panic disorder is the subject of a clinical discussion by a Washington psychiatrist in the 1 June issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. He states that the disorder is twice as common among women as among men and may show one peak in late adolescence and another in the mid-30s. Diagnostic criteria require current attacks of anxiety building to a peak within seconds or minutes and changes of behaviour such as avoiding social activities and concern about subsequent attacks or fits of unawareness.

Panic has both biological and environmental causes. Some 80 per cent of patients report major life stresses during the previous 12 months. A history of sexual or physical abuse in childhood and smoking by teenagers increase the risk. As many as 90 per cent will suffer at least one other psychiatric disorder during their lifetime. Education about the disorder is helpful.

Randomised trials have shown that five types of medication are effective in patients with panic disorder. Selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-nonadrenaline-reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors have been used. Vanlafaxine in doses of 75 to 225 mg per day has reduced panic, anticipatory anxiety and fear and avoidance of social activities. For safety reasons, the first option has been given to selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, although these tend to produce side effects early in treatment, before therapeutic effects are seen.

A disadvantage of benzodiazepines is that possibly 40 to 80 per cent of patients treated with them for longer than four months may experience a withdrawal syndrome characterised by anxiety, irritability, headache, muscle tension, perceptual abnormalities, insomnia, decreased power of concentration and cardiorespiratory symptoms when they stop medication. Cognitive behavioural treatment over three to four months has effects comparable to those of antidepressants.

Some improvement is expected within two to four weeks with medication and four to eight weeks with cognitive behavioural therapy, though a full response to either method may take eight to 12 weeks to appear. Close follow-up is recommended since up to one third of patients will have a relapse within two years of the completion of treatment.

Back to Top


Survival may turn on faculty of foresight

In Science for 19 May, a psychologist from Brisbane considers how the art of foresight developed in the human mind and contributed to survival of our remote ancestors. Humans are attributed the ubiquitous capacity to imagine, plan for and shape the future. This faculty must have long been important to our survival through the millennia ands may have been a prime mover in human cognitive evolution.

The stone toolkits and spears discovered by archaeologists indicate that our ancestors prepared for the future and it is to be noted that although the great apes have not invented containers for carrying tools they have shown that they are capable of storing such tools for future use. Apes seem capable of imagining situations they cannot directly perceive and they can devise simple tools to solve such things as feeding problems. Yet there is little evidence that they can ponder the more distant future needs.

In experiments non-human primates have shown a capacity for choosing a suitable tool from a range of instruments, although sometimes their choice is second best. Chimpanzees show no signs of considering future needs apart from satisfying present demands. Subhuman animals may be limited by an inability to entertain future needs, through lack of imagination, but as regards foresight, we still have much to learn about it in the human sphere. Studies have tended to look at memory rather than anticipation, but it is possible that remembering past episodes and seeing future events may be two aspects of the faculty called mental time travel.

Humans need to develop better foresight if they are to continue to survive on this planet.

Back to Top


Arguments continue over our dwarf ancesters from Indonesia

Comparison of skullsThe rather spirited arguments over the celebrated dwarfs who left their fossilised remains in the island of Flores in Indonesia show no signs of settling down into an agreed pattern.

In Science for 2 June and Nature for 1 June, according to commentators, “The battle of the hobbits is heating up”. Sceptics have recently argued that the fossils discovered on Flores do not represent a distinct race but are simply from diseased modern humans, Homo sapiens. The discoverers continue to argue that these dwarfs evolved from a remote Homo ancestor.

The stone tools associated with H floresiensis resemble those newly discovered from a much more ancient site nearby, suggesting a cultural continuity over hundreds of thousands of years. These ancient tools come from Mata Menge, situated 50km from the Liang Bua cave on Flores where other tools and bones were discovered.

There is plenty of evidence that Floresian man was a keen toolmaker. More than 500 stone blades have been dated to more than 700,000 years ago. All were made by chipping large flakes from volcanic cobbles.

Moreover, stones called “perforators” were made by striking cores and making points and retouched edges. Some of these artefacts are simialr to blades used in more modern times, but this resemblance has been attributed to coincidence. Floresians may have inherited some tools attributed to H erectis.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal