Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7408 p35
8 July 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Central role in primary care remains a long way off

There is a long way to go before a more central role in primary care is created for community pharmacists in England. So said Under-Secretary of State for Care Services Ivan Lewis in a Parliamentary debate last week.

Responding to a Westminster Hall debate on primary care trusts, Mr Lewis said: “I suspect that if we looked throughout the country, we would find there was a patchiness — the new word — in the extent to which PCTs put the role of community pharmacists at the centre of their planning and commissioning. I agree that we should think far more seriously about it.”

Mr Lewis was responding to comments made during the debate by chairman of the All-Party Pharmacy Group Howard Stoate (Lab Dartford), who wanted pharmacists to have a greater strategic role in the management of PCTs.

“At the moment it is quite rare to find pharmacists involved in the decision-making process at PCT level.As a result they lack any real say in defining local health care and clinical priorities,” said Dr Stoate.

He added that the mandatory appointment of community pharmacists to PCT executive committees would be a good way of ensuring that the voice of pharmacy was heard at executive level. Increased PCT liaison with local pharmaceutical committees would also ensure that PCTs made best use of community pharmacists’ skills, he added.

“PCTs should be encouraged to commission and properly fund new primary care services from pharmacists,” Dr Stoate went on. The Government should have made it clear that it wanted community pharmacy to play a key role in the delivery of primary care services.

After the debate, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s director of public affairs, Beverley Parkin, commented: “It is important that Parliament has heard that pharmacists need to be more engaged in strategic decision-making at local level and that the minister has acknowledged that there are problems with pharmacist involvement in service commissioning in parts of the country.These are important messages that we have been communicating as part of our public affairs programme but we want to see that, as well as being heard, they will be acted on.”

As part of its public affairs programme, the Society has been briefing MPs, ministers, special advisers and other stakeholders on the key issues for the future of primary care. On 3 July, the Society’s President, Hemant Patel, gave oral evidence to a joint inquiry of the all-party groups on primary care and public health and on social care in which he highlighted the role of community pharmacists in supporting people with long-term conditions. Mr Patel raised concerns that the move to practice-based commissioning could undo work to develop patient-focused services. “We believe that it is essential that community pharmacists are actively involved in practice-based commissioning and that action should be taken to ensure that this occurs,” he told the group.

Mr Patel called for better alignment of the contracts for general practice and community pharmacy, longer term, more sustainable contracts for community pharmacy and proper access to patient information to support new services.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal