Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7409 p75
15 July 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· CPPE
· Controlled drugs (2)
· The Society (2)
· Fellowship
· The Journal


Letters to the Editor

The Journal

Declarations of interest

From Mr J. Underhill, MRPharmS

A number of recent letters in The Pharmaceutical Journal have prompted me to look in vain for a declaration of interest statement from the authors. Examples include the recent letter by Norman Evans (PJ, 1 July, p11) promulgating the use of lercanidipine with the almost exclusive use of the brand name (Zanidip) to describe the drug in question, a practice usually being the domain of industry-sponsored promotional materials.

What is the policy of the PJ on this? Most, if not all, other professional journals ask for prospective contributors (for articles or letters) to provide a statement giving them the opportunity to declare any interests they may have.

Everyone’s thoughts can be influenced by their experiences and values so the existence of any financial arrangements between authors and pharmaceutical manufacturers are, therefore, of interest to readers so we can make a judgement as to validity of the opinions given. This is particularly the case where statements are made without a suitable reference to support them, as in the case of Mr Evans’s letter.

In this age of openness and clinical governance, I would strongly urge the PJ to adopt an editorial policy where such declarations are made a necessary part of any contribution to the columns of the PJ.

Jonathan Underhill
Assistant Director, Education and Development
National Prescribing Centre

 

Since Mr Evans was referring in particular to a branded drug, we thought it appropriate in this case to use the brand name rather than the generic name. Mr Evans has confirmed that there are no financial arrangements between him and the manufacturer of Zanidip. He did supply references with his letter but we omitted these because we were not able to confirm their full citations as we went to press. The relevant references are:

· Borghi C, Prandin MG, Dormi A, Ambrosiani E. Improved tolerability of the dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist lercanidipine: the lercanidipine challenge trial. Blood Pressure Supplement 2003;1:14–21.

· Fogari R, Mugellini A, Corradi L, et al. Efficacy of lercanidipine vs losartan on left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. Journal of Hypertension 2000;18(Suppl 2):S65.

· Greener M. Wasted medicines and avoidable adverse events: a multibillion pound problem. Journal of Medical Economics 2006;9:27–44.

The Journal’s advice for contributors has been available on our website for many years. There, we clearly state our policy: “Submitted articles, papers or letters should include a declaration of any financial, commercial, personal or occupational interest that readers should know about.”
EDITOR

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Fellowship)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal