Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7411 p125
29 July 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Indicative rates for enhanced services set in Wales

Agreed indicative rates

Care home support service (annual fees based on two visits per annum)

<10 beds

£253.74

10–30 beds

£388.63

31–50 beds

£500.06

51–70 beds

£711.21

Minor ailment service

Annual fee

£134.45

Consultation fee

£3.46

Pharmaceutical rota services

Weekday

£61.20

Saturday (if open)

£76.50

Saturday (if closed)

£153.00

Sunday

£153.00

Bank Holiday

£153.00

Special Bank Holiday

£306.00

Community Pharmacy Wales and local health boards in Wales have developed “indicative rates” for the provision of three national enhanced services, it was announced last week. Concerns had previously been raised that establishing benchmark prices for enhanced services could contravene the Competition Act.

The rates for Wales have been agreed for care home support, minor ailments and pharmaceutical rota (out of hours) services. CPW and the LHBs are also in discussions to agree rates for syringe and needle exchange and supervised administration of medicines.

In March, the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee explained in Community Pharmacy News that primary care organisations could risk contravening the Competition Act if they discuss pricing among themselves before entering into agreements with local pharmaceutical committees on the pricing of enhanced services.

However, Catherine Stanley, business and contracts manager at CPW, explained to The Journal that the implications of the Competition Act had been fully considered when drawing up the rates for Wales and the explanation of them. “Indicative rates,” CPW says, “are intended to be rates that are perceived by all parties to the negotiation as being fair rates for the provision of the service as specified in the national enhanced services templates.”

CPW says that both it and LHBs nonetheless recognise that some enhanced services may differ from those described in the national templates and so payment for these may vary accordingly.

“Where this is the case the service will be considered a locally revised national enhanced service and agreement on a remuneration rate for the service will be reached between the LHB and the appropriate CPW regional committee utilising guidance provided by PSNC,” CPW says.

Steve Lutener, head of regulation for the PSNC, told The Journal that in England benchmark prices could be established, without contravening the Competition Act, if they were agreed by the PSNC, the Department of Health and the NHS Executive, so long as there was freedom to negotiate terms within the services. He also said that the Office of Fair Trading had told the PSNC that it did not believe that publishing historical data on the pricing of enhanced services would contravene the Competition Act.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal