Study authors discourage immediate use of chloramphenicol
Delaying the prescribing of antibiotics for the treatment of conjunctivitis
is a more favourable strategy than immediate treatment with chloramphenicol
drops, according to the authors of a recent study (BMJ
Online First,
17 July 2006, "A randomised
controlled trial of management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis
in general
practice").
Investigators randomised 307 adults and children, who presented with
acute infective conjunctivitis at 30 general practices in southern England,
to receive either immediate antibiotic treatment with chloramphenicol
drops, delayed antibiotic treatment (prescription to be collected from
the surgery at the parents’ or patient’s discretion after
three days) or no treatment (control).
The study found that the duration of moderate symptoms was shorter with
antibiotics: controls, 4.8 days; immediate antibiotics, 3.3 days (risk
ratio 0.7, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.6–0.8); delayed antibiotics,
3.9 days (0.8, CI 0.7–0.9).
Due to the nature of the study, patients in the control group were able
to consult their GP, and the GPs were able to prescribe antibiotics as
they deemed appropriate. Antibiotic use was highest in the immediate
antibiotic group (99 per cent of patients compared with 53 per cent for
the delayed antibiotic group). Despite no offer of antibiotics in the
control group, significant antibiotic use (30 per cent of patients) still
occurred.
The authors found that patients in the delayed treatment group were less
likely than those in the control group to revisit the GP within two weeks;
however, no significant difference in the number of revisits was found
between the immediate antibiotic group and the control group.
The authors conclude that delayed prescribing of antibiotics is probably
a better course of action for treating patients with acute infective
conjunctivitis in primary care: “It reduces antibiotic use, … provides similar duration and severity of symptoms to immediate prescribing,
and reduces reattendance for eye infections.”
Chloramphenicol
eye drops were reclassified as a pharmacy medicine last
year (PJ, 11 June 2005, p697). A spokeswoman for the Royal Pharmaceutical
Society said that the Society’s practice guidance for OTC chloramphenicol
reflects current prescribing advice for the treatment of acute bacterial
conjunctivitus.
“The Society believes that making this product, with a very good
history as a prescribed medicine, available over-the-counter from registered
pharmacies enhances choice and increases access. It may also have a beneficial
impact on GP workload and prescribing costs by helping to reduce the
likelihood of reattendance for eye infections at GP surgeries,” the
spokeswoman added. |