| · The profession (2)
· Regulation
· Code of Ethics (2)
Letters to the Editor
|
The profession
Reach a wider audience
From Dr B. P. Curwain, MRPharmS
I would like to reinforce the message in your editorial (PJ, 5 August,
p150). Letters to The Journal are read mostly by pharmacists. The PJ is an excellent medium for us to have discussions within the profession
but there are clearly times when we must aim to reach a wider audience.
A few months ago, in response to some intemperate remarks about the development
of non-medical prescribing, I was moved to write to The Times. To my
surprise, it printed my letter about a week later. The following day,
a consultant physician colleague approached me after a committee meeting
to say that he had seen my letter. We were able then to have a sensible
discussion of the issues.
So, pharmacists should write to the national press on pharmaceutical
matters. Perhaps it would be helpful also if, when the editor sees such
communications, they are mentioned in the PJ, thus reminding us that
we can be heard in the wider world.
Brian Curwain
Member of Council
Royal Pharmaceutical Society
Defend our role!
From Mr A. B. Sutherland, MRPharmS
I read, with interest, David
Thomas’s letter about the letter praising
hospital pharmacists in The Daily Telegraph (PJ, 29 July, p132) and felt
no small amount of pride seeing a colleague receive such praise in the
national press.
Now, imagine my horror the following day on reading The Times. A columnist
called “Dr Copperfield” wrote his Saturday column under the
title “Just
grab the pills and run” (The Times, “Body
and soul” supplement, 29 July, p4) in which the author wrote a highly
disparaging piece about community pharmacists and medicines use reviews.
I hope that in the same vein as doctors and nurses, who will vigorously
defend their profession from attacks in press, a member of the Royal Pharmaceutical
Society’s Council will write in defence of our community colleagues
and their extended role.
Adam Sutherland
Glasgow |