Systematic strategy outlined for heavily treated HIV-infected patients
A strategy for dealing with heavily treated HIV-infected patients who are experiencing treatment failure with multiple classes of antiretrovirals is proposed in the latest issue of Lancet
Infectious Diseases (2006;6:496).
Infectious disease specialists from the US and Italy suggest that resistance
testing should be used to determine the optimum salvage regimen, and
that it should be conducted while the patient is on therapy or within
four weeks of drug discontinuation.
They explain that phenotypic resistance testing provides a quantitative
measure of the likely activity of each drug and identifies
hypersusceptibility to a particular agent more reliably than genotypic
testing.
As part of their strategy they recommend inclusion of at least two drugs
with activity against resistant virus. They also warn that delaying a
switch from a failing regimen could result in accumulation of additional
resistant mutations, diminishing future treatment options. However, for
patients with no active antiretroviral treatment options available to
them, the specialists say that continuation of the failing regimen should
be considered.
Another option is double-boosted protease inhibitors. However, the specialists
point out that a lack of evidence for increased efficacy and the emergence
of new protease inhibitors and other classes of antiretrovirals make
this a less attractive alternative.
Structured treatment interruption, a strategy designed to reverse resistant
mutations and increase the likelihood of durable virological suppression
when therapy is reintroduced, is not favoured by the specialists.
Finally, they propose that therapeutic drug monitoring, integrated with
resistance test results, should be incorporated into the treatment strategy
to predict virological response.
They conclude: “Although the best overall strategy might be to
take the necessary steps to avoid development of resistance earlier in
the course of treatment, a systematic approach like the one we have outlined
could lead to a successful outcome even in [heavily treated patients].” |