Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7415 p246
26 August 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Department of Health
· Work pressures (2)
· Homoeopathy (2)
· Controlled drugs
· Safety
· Oxygen service
· Compliance aids
· Needle exchange
· Paracetamol
· Smoking cessation
· The profession (2)
· Retention fees (4)
· The Society (2)
· Public image


Letters to the Editor

Work pressures

PDA policy on staffing and working time (Mr J. Murphy)

Picture not accurate (Mr M. Stein)

PDA policy on staffing and working time

From Mr J. Murphy, MRPharmS

There has been a considerable debate regarding pharmacists’ workload in these columns and in last week’s Broad spectrum (PJ, 19 August, p218). The Pharmacists Defence Association has long been running a campaign for there to be a requirement that employers be transparent about what pharmacists can expect to be an acceptable level of staff resources and skill mix in the pharmacy. I am encouraged by the recent interest in this important area.

The PDA is aware that it is difficult to lay down industry-wide standards because of the variation in size of over-the-counter business, dispensing throughput, prescription acquisition and supply methods, and the facilities in any given pharmacy. The experience and ability of those involved may further complicate the issue.

However, it should not present problems for the superintendent pharmacist (or responsible pharmacist) to make it clear to employees, locums, financial managers and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s inspectorate, the number and skill mix of staff required to guarantee patient safety. If employers are prepared to stand by the fact that staff levels are as safe as they can be, then they should have nothing to fear and much to gain.

The Code of Ethics is currently under review. Now is an ideal time for the Society and its members to make a stand on the expectation that pharmacy owners and companies should be transparent in their staffing models and plans to meet workload demands.

The Fitness to Practise Directorate, if need be, could hold them to account for falling short of their own standards and would have a benchmark from which they could judge whether those standards are acceptable.

Following research and consultation with our members, the PDA has produced a policy on staffing levels and working times which it urges the Code of Ethics working group to consider during its deliberations. This is available on the website www.the-pda.org

John Murphy
Director,
Pharmacists Defence Association


Picture not accurate

From Mr M. Stein, MRPharmS

Pharmacists under pressureI must take issue with the picture that appeared on the front cover of last week’s PJ (19 August 2006) depicting “Pharmacists under pressure”.

You always have your finger on the button and get pictures which illustrate articles with such accuracy. How could you be so wrong with this one?

Who manages to sit down?

Now, if you showed a pharmacist collapsing while on his feet …

Malcolm Stein
Hatfield, Hertfordshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Department of Health)
Next Topic (Homoeopathy)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal