Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7415 p247
26 August 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Department of Health
· Work pressures (2)
· Homoeopathy (2)
· Controlled drugs
· Safety
· Oxygen service
· Compliance aids
· Needle exchange
· Paracetamol
· Smoking cessation
· The profession (2)
· Retention fees (4)
· The Society (2)
· Public image


Letters to the Editor

Oxygen service

Unsatisfied patients

From Mrs S. Glass, MRPharmS, and Mr D. Taylor, MRPharmS

Your news item read “New oxygen suppliers may not meet 1 August deadline” (PJ, 15 July, p66) and they have not. This means that they are now seven months behind schedule, actually 10 months if anyone can remember as far back as the first deadline in 2005. This would be bad enough if the service when, or if, it finally arrives is good or even passable.

We wrote to you in March (PJ, 11 March, p292) expressing disquiet about the situation and a reference to oxygen concentrators was edited out of the letter on the grounds that it was “not relevant to the main point”. It has become increasingly relevant to many of our former oxygen patients; they have been issued with a concentrator whether they like it or not. Is this “more modern, up-to-date equipment than you get from a pharmacy”as touted in an introductory letter to patients? The criterion for issue has been reduced and, as we suspected, hence the reference in March, Air Products is issuing concentrators to as many patients as possible. This means that only one or two service visits a year are needed, rather than a regular supply of cylinders.

Concentrators are noisy. This has an impact if oxygen is required through the night and they cannot be put in a car for occasional trips. Most importantly they run on electricity paid for by the patient and not the NHS.

We know of at least two patients on our list who have resisted the issue of a concentrator but who have then had a less than ideal service for cylinder supply.

We are being urged to carry out customer satisfaction surveys and we urge primary care trusts and organisations to carry out a survey among oxygen patients and act on the results. Without exception, our patients who have rung to request a final uplift of cylinders because they are now in the hands of Air Products, have expressed a desire to remain with the status quo.

Give oxygen service back to pharmacies. This was always one Government initiative too far and it is still not too late for a u-turn.

Sheila Glass 
Denis Taylor

Penhill Pharmacy
Swindon, Wiltshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Safety)
Next Topic (Compliance aids)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal