Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7416 p276
2 September 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 110K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Asthma
· Homoeopathy
· Controlled drugs
· Compliance aids
· MURs
· Safety (2)
· Retention fees
· The Society (2)


Letters to the Editor

Safety

Interactions with other substances (Mr S. Howshall)

Madopar packaging confusing (Mrs S. J. Carr)

Interactions with other substances

From Mr S. Howshall, MRPharmS

Patients, generally, do not regard substances they consume as capable of affecting their prescription medicines. I always ask patients about over-the-counter medicines, herbs, vitamins and minerals when conducting medicines use reviews. Often, reluctantly, patients give this information with surprising results.

Last week I conducted an MUR with a patient chosen because she was on warfarin and had just been prescribed omeprazole. I intended to warn her to get a blood test because of the interaction of these drugs. I noticed that she had recently been prescribed two other proton pump inhibitors. She told me that these had not worked so I recommended a change of time for taking the drug. We went through the other drugs she was taking again and I was able to suggest changes to optimise her treatment. At the end I asked if she was taking anything else; she said paracetamol, for pain in her arthritic hands. We discussed that she should not take fish oil because of warfarin but she said that, on the doctor’s advice, she was taking 1.5g glucosamine daily. I explained this was a high dose and could be the cause of her stomach problems. She is now going to stop taking the glucosamine but if I had not asked the extra questions it would not have come to light.

This is not the first time I have uncovered a potentially dangerous interaction of prescribed and purchased drugs. Pharmacists conducting MURs should always be on the lookout for such cases. Incidentally, I have recently learnt that one litre of ice cream can affect warfarin levels.

Sue Howshall
Wimborne, Dorset


Madopar packaging confusing

From Mrs S. J. Carr, MRPharmS

I recently visited a patient with Parkinson’s disease whose medicines regimen had been changed by his consultant. He now takes three different strengths of Madopar. He has, among others, two bottles of Madopar 125. One is labelled “Madopar 125” and the other “Madopar 100/25”. To us they are the same thing but to a non-pharmacist, the people who have to take these medicines, they are confusing.

Is there any logical reason that these are labelled differently? For whose benefit are they labelled differently? Parkinson’s patients are usually on complicated regimens plus several other (non-Parkinson) medicines, and it is up to us to try to simplify and clarify things as far as possible. It would help us and the patients, enormously if the industry would take some responsibility in this respect and label medicines clearly, unambiguously and consistently.

Sharon Carr
Specialist Clinical Pharmacist
Brent Rehab Service

 

A REPRESENTATIVE from the corporate affairs department, Roche, responds:

The UK carton and label carries the name “Madopar 100mg/25mg hard capsules”. Some countries within the EU have different labelling requirements and therefore cartons and labels in those countries may be labelled “Madopar 125”. In each case the labelling states specifically that the capsule contains 100mg levodopa and 25mg benserazide. It may be that the patient you refer to had a UK/IE Roche pack and a parallel import pack from another EU country, which does happen. Legally, the parallel importer must over-label the imported pack, which does not appear to have occurred in this particular case, and hence, the difference in the labelling of each pack.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Medicines use reviews)
Next Topic (Retention fees)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal