Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7416 p270
2 September 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Uncertainty remains over TNF inhibitors and risk of cancer

Patients receiving tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis are not at substantially greater risk of cancer than those receiving methotrexate, researchers have found. The findings appear to clash with other research suggesting a greater likelihood of malignancies compared with placebo (PJ, 3 June, p649).

In the recent study (Arthritis & Rheumatism 2006;54:2757), researchers analysed data from 1,152 patients taking biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) — TNF inhibitor (etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab) or interleukin-1 inhibitor (anakinra) — alongside data from 7,306 patients taking methotrexate. The authors say that patients taking methotrexate were chosen for the comparison group because the severity of rheumatoid arthritis would be similar to those receiving biological DMARDs.

They found that, overall, there was no difference in the risk of cancers between the two groups (biological DMARD versus methotrexate; adjusted pooled hazard ratio 0.98, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.73–1.31). The hazard ratios for lymphoproliferative, haematologic or solid cancers were 1.11 (CI 0.51–2.37), 1.37 (CI 0.71–2.65) and 0.91 (CI 0.65–1.26), respectively.

The authors say that the results do not rule out an increased risk of cancers in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biological DMARDs compared with those receiving non-methotrexate DMARDs, or in non-rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving the agents. They conclude: “Despite the use of large combined data sets, studying the effect of an infrequent exposure (biologic DMARDs) on rare diseases (haematologic malignancies) remains a challenge.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal