Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7416 p271
2 September 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Further data oppose inhaled steroids in child wheeze

The strategy of giving inhaled corticosteroids to wheezy children to prevent the development of asthma has lost further ground with new data published in The Lancet (2006;368:754).

Researchers found that inhaled fluticasone propionate given to preschool children with wheeze did not affect the natural history of asthma or wheeze later in childhood, adding support to studies with similar findings published earlier this year (PJ, 13 May, p558).

The research, which saw the follow-up of 173 children up to five years of age, showed no difference in measures of wheeze or asthma, or in the use of asthma medicines between fluticasone- and placebo-treated patients. In addition, no improvement in lung function was reported.

In fact, according to the authors, a subgroup analysis reveals that children in the treatment group had poorer lung function than those in the placebo group, as measured by post-bronchodilator specific airway resistance (SRaw). The same effect was not seen for forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).

They say: “Although the significance of this finding is unclear, there remains a possibility that early use of inhaled corticosteroids in very young children could be detrimental to lung development, which is thought to continue over the first few years of life.”

A small improvement in symptom scores (P=0.02) and unscheduled visits to a doctor for wheeziness (P=0.05) was seen in the third month of the study only.

The authors conclude that prescribers should not rush into treating intermittent infantile wheeze with inhaled corticosteroids due to the lack of long-term benefit in their study population and the small benefit seen for symptoms.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal