Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7417 p319
9 September 2006


Society summary


Guidance on further changes to Controlled Drug legislation

Guidance on further changes to the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 has been issued by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.

The guidance was published at the end of August and appears in a Law and Ethics Bulletin in this issue of The Pharmaceutical Journal (p322).

The amendments to the regulations took effect on 1 September. One of the changes makes clear that the requirement for private CD prescriptions to be written on a standard form does not extend to veterinary prescriptions, and neither does the requirement for prescriptions to bear a prescriber identification number on it. The prescribing of CDs for treating animals continues as previously.

Although veterinary CD prescriptions should continue to be retained for two years on the premises from which the medicines are supplied, such a requirement no longer applies for private CD prescriptions for medicines for human use. This requirement has been rescinded to allow private prescription forms to be sent to the relevant NHS agency. However, until corresponding changes have been made to the Medicines (Sale or Supply) (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 1980, pharmacists should continue to retain the standardised private prescription form and send a copy to the NHS agency.

Another effect of the amending legislation to to delay for a year the implementation of new record-keeping requirements for Schedule 2 Controlled Drugs from 1 January 2007 until 1 January 2008. A requirement to record in the CD register whether the person collecting a Schedule 2 CD is the patient, the patient’s representative or a health care professional will not now come into force until 1 January 2008. Similarly delayed are requirements to record whether the patient or patient’s representative collecting a Schedule 2 CD provided evidence of identity and to record the name and address of the health care professional who collects a Schedule 2 CD on behalf of a patient.

Although the implementation date for these record-keeping requirements has been delayed, the guidance reminds pharmacists that current legislation requires them to ascertain whether the person collecting a Schedule 2 CD is the patient, the patient’s representative or a health care professional.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal