Home > PJ (current issue) > Reviews | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7419 p373
23 September 2006

Reviews (Books)

An invaluable, if sizeable, reference for serious collectors

'A historical guide to delftware and Victorian ointment pots — 1730–1950', by R. J. Houghton and M. R. Priestley. Pp 148. Price £20 (+£4 p&p). Published by the authors. Available from ointment.pots@virgin.net or by telephoning 07969 785350


This guide starts with short introductory sections about delftware, Victorian and Edwardian ointment pots, and the rapid growth in the number of the remedies they contained, a guide to current prices, and the type of research undertaken by the authors. The main part of the book consists of an illustrated catalogue of delftware and earthenware ointment pots from both public and private collections.

The catalogue is divided into two sections: “Delftware 1750–1820” and “Victorian and Edwardian 1820–1930”. I think that 16th–18th century would be a better dating for the delftware, and late 18th–mid 20th century for the later pots. This would be more accurate and, I hope, avoid the implication that there was a sudden transition from tin-glazed to lead-glazed earthenware rather than a gradual one. Porcelain and stoneware specimens are indicated. The histories of the purveyors of these ointments have been researched, but the varying amount of information available, and the great variation in the number of different types of each pot has resulted in considerable differences in the space allotted to each ointment. Most of the pots are portrayed using excellent photographs, and the dimensions of the majority are given. The wording on each pot is given in full.

There are some errors, for example, Compound Extract of Sarsaparilla (p122) and Yadil Antiseptic Jelly (pp142–3) were not ointments. They were to be taken internally.

I prefer the term “English delftware”, the upper case “D” being reserved for articles made in the town of Delft. “Antiquities” (p112 & p113) is normally used for articles made before the middle ages, and “antiques” would be more suitable.

This book is well-produced and its great strength lies in its numerous illustrations and the dimensions and the details of all the inscriptions on the pots. These should make it invaluable to any serious collector of these interesting artefacts. However, unfortunately, it does lack a bibliography or a list of suggestions for further reading and with a width of 24cm, it will not fit easily on all bookshelves.

All things considered, I believe it to be excellent value for money, and recommend it to collectors and those who are interested in the history of popular medicine.


Bill Jackson (a past president of the British Society for the History of Pharmacy)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal