Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7420 p392-393
30 September 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Medical regulation
· PSNC
· Drug interactions
· Nutraceuticals
· Community pharmacy


Letters to the Editor

Nutraceuticals

Use of nutraceuticals in cancer

From Dr M. de Lemos, MRPharmS

Hill et al have provided an extensive review of nutraceuticals that may have some anti-cancer activities (PJ, 2 September, pp277–84). From my experience of advising cancer patients on natural health products, there are several points I would like to emphasise.

First, prevention and treatment of cancer are two different things. A substance that may help to prevent cancer is not necessarily useful for the treatment of the disease, and vice versa. For example, oestrogen alone can promote the continuing growth of oestrogen-receptor positive breast cancer. Hence anti-oestrogen therapy like tamoxifen may arrest the progress of this disease. However, oestrogen alone is not sufficient to cause de novo development of breast cancer, otherwise many more women would have developed breast cancer.

Second, a randomised, controlled trial has shown that 25g of flaxseed in muffins may reduce the proliferation of breast tumour cell growth in women with breast cancer.1 Another issue with flaxseed is that, like other phytoestrogens, one needs to consider the implication of its oestrogenic effect on women with breast cancer, particularly if it is oestrogen-receptor positive. For example, can it interfere with the efficacy of antioestrogen therapy like tamoxifen? Animal studies do not seem to suggest that.2,3 However, given that the oestrogenic lignans need to be converted by the gut bacteria, one needs to be careful in extrapolating rodent studies to humans, each with their own microflora. Interestingly, flaxseed oil has been shown to increase breast tumour growth in transgenic mice at certain doses.4

Finally, Lissoni et al produced nearly all the randomised studies on melatonin versus observation in cancer patients5–12 and few have duplicated their findings.13 There are several limitations to their studies. It is unclear if assessment was blinded, which may be important when the endpoints included reduction in toxicity. It is unclear if some patients were included in more than one report,5,6,10 as few details on the patients and cross-references with previous studies were provided. Also missing were details on the methods of randomisation, prognostic factors, chemotherapy regimens, etc.7,10 In some cases, the survival data presented were unclear. For the advanced disease study, less than 50 per cent of the events had occurred at one year. Hence, the apparent increase in survival may be premature.7 In contrast, the survival curves for the lung cancer study were presented as five-year ones, although most patients already died within the first year.10

Mário de Lemos
Vancouver, Canada


References

1. Thompson LU, Chen JM, Li T, et al. Dietary flaxseed alters tumor biological markers in postmenopausal breast cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 2005;11:3828–35.

2. Chen J, Hui E, Ip T, et al. Dietary flaxseed enhances the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on the growth of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (mcf-7) in nude mice. Clinical Cancer Research 2004;10:7703–11.

3. Chen JM, Mann J, Thompson LU. Dietary flaxseed dose dependently enhances the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on the growth of human breast cancer (MCF-7) xenografts in nude mice. FASEB Journal 2005;19(Part 2 Suppl S):A993 (abstract 583.6).

4. Rao GN, Ney E, Herbert RA. Effect of melatonin and linolenic acid on mammary cancer in transgenic mice with c-neu breast cancer oncogene. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2000;64:287–96.

5. Lissoni P, Paolorossi F, Ardizzoia A, et al. A randomized study of chemotherapy with cisplatin plus etoposide versus chemoendocrine therapy with cisplatin, etoposide and the pineal hormone melatonin as a first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in a poor clinical state. Journal of Pineal Research 1997;23:15–19.

6. Lissoni P, Barni S, Ardizzoia A, et al. Randomized study with the pineal hormone melatonin versus supportive care alone in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer resistant to a first-line chemotherapy containing cisplatin. Oncology 1992;49:336–9.

7. Lissoni P. Is there a role for melatonin in supportive care? Support Care Cancer 2002;10:110–16.

8. Lissoni P, Barni S, Mandala M, et al. Decreased toxicity and increased efficacy of cancer chemotherapy using the pineal hormone melatonin in metastatic solid tumour patients with poor clinical status. European Journal of Cancer 1999;35:1688–92.

9. Lissoni P, Tancini G, Barni S, et al. Treatment of cancer chemotherapy-induced toxicity with the pineal hormone melatonin. Support Care Cancer 1997;5:126–9.

10.Lissoni P, Chilelli M, Villa S, et al. Five years survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and melatonin: a randomized trial. Journal of Pineal Research 2003;35:12–15.

11.Lissoni P, Meregalli S, Nosetto L, et al. Increased survival time in brain glioblastomas by a radioneuroendocrine strategy with radiotherapy plus melatonin compared to radiotherapy alone. Oncology 1996;53:43–6.

12.Lissoni P, Barni S, Ardizzoia A, et al. A randomized study with the pineal hormone melatonin versus supportive care alone in patients with brain metastases due to solid neoplasms. Cancer 1994;73:699–701.

13.Cerea G, Vaghi M, Ardizzoia A, et al. Biomodulation of cancer chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized study of weekly low-dose irinotecan alone versus irinotecan plus the oncostatic pineal hormone melatonin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients progressing on 5-fluorouracil-containing combinations. Anticancer Research 2003;23(2C):1951–4.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Drug interactions)
Next Topic (Community pharmacy)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal