Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7421 p422
7 October 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· The profession
· Messaging service
· Prescribing of statins
· NHS
· The Society
· Pfizer products (5)
· Statutory Committee (2)


Letters to the Editor

The Society

The Council has written its own meal ticket

From Mr J. E. Balmford, FRPharmS

As the mover of “Motion C” at the branch representatives’ meeting on 25 May, which dealt with attendance fees paid to Royal Pharmaceutical Society Council members and was carried by the meeting, I am not satisfied with the response given by the Council (PJ, 16 September, p351).

I wrote to Ann Lewis, Secretary and Registrar, on 24 October 2005, objecting to the proposed alteration to the byelaw and pointing out that the Privy Council had expressed the view that the fees payable to members of Council should be a matter for the Society’s own members. I therefore urged the Privy Council to insist that any increase in fees would have to be approved by an annual general meeting.

I received a reply from the Privy Council on 31 October 2005, which stated that the point I raised was interesting and appropriate, and that it would be in accordance with good governance that control was exercised by a body independent of the Council itself.

Despite this reply, the Council went ahead and sought the approval of the Privy Council and had the amendment to the first paragraph of (3) of section VII of the byelaw approved. The Council, presumably on the advice of senior staff, have now written their own “meal ticket”.

The Council’s response as published in the PJ (16 September, p351) ignores the membership. The annual general meeting, in spite of its small attendance, is representative of a large section of the Society — many of those attending are also branch representatives and are therefore an important voice. Even if the AGM cannot approve increases in attendance fees owing to perceived difficulties caused by the interests of pharmacy technicians and the need to avoid a proxy vote, any views and observations expressed at any AGM would have to be considered.

John E. Balmford
Past President
Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (NHS)
Next Topic (Pfizer products)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal