Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7421 p415
7 October 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Schizophrenia drugs must be better managed

Viewing Medicine

Mental health patients

Mental health patients may receive little information about drugs they are given

Management of medicines for people with schizophrenia needs to improve, the Healthcare Commission has insisted.

The commission surveyed all 174 local implementation teams (LITs) that plan community mental health services in England. It found that 84 per cent of LITs were rated fair or weak on the management of medicines for patients with schizophrenia. LITs also performed poorly in terms of providing patients with information about their medicines: only 5 per cent obtained the top score for telling patients about possible side effects.

A Healthcare Commission survey of users of community mental health services also found deficiencies in the information patients were given. Only half (47 per cent) of those questioned said they had been given a copy of their care plan and only 42 per cent believed that they had been involved in decisions about their medicines.

Sue Champion, associate director of nursing at North Essex Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (one of the trusts given an “excellent” score in the review), commented: “We always try to involve patients as much as possible in their medication management. At each appointment the community psychiatric nurse or care worker will always talk to patient about the medicines they are prescribed using the patient information leaflet.

The team’s six-monthly reviews of its care programme involve a range of professions, she added. “We try to involve our pharmacy colleagues as much as possible at all stages and particularly in discharge planning, because of their expertise in the use of medicines and advice on tailored supply such as the use of medi-doses and small quantities. … That is something we would like to do more of in the future.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal