Home > PJ (current issue) > Leading article | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7422 p436
14 October 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 20K, Acrobat Reader

Leading Article

Who are the leaders?

Now that the call for nominations for election to the three pharmacy boards for England, Scotland and Wales has been heard (7 October, p432), members of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society have a good opportunity to think about professional leadership and what it means to them.

People who lead the profession might be defined as those who are elected to the Society’s Council or who represent any of the pharmacy organisations, such as the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, the National Pharmacy Association or the Guild of Healthcare Pharmacists. Without doubt they are pharmacy politicians but are they the only leaders of the profession? What about those pharmacists who are leading-edge practitioners — pharmacists who are key figures in the UK Clinical Pharmacists Association, for example, pharmacists who are supplementary prescribers in a particular specialty, or pharmacists who are members of the faculties of the College of Pharmacy Practice? And do not overlook those hoping to become consultant pharmacists in the next 12 months or to be recognised as a PhwSI (a pharmacist with a special interest). Are they not leaders of the profession, too?

What style of leadership do you prefer? Is it somebody who makes difficult decisions on your behalf and who, by definition, cannot always be popular? Or do you look for someone who is a consensus politician, who seeks to keep as many people as possible happy?

Is your preference somebody who leads by example or who pushes from behind? Do you look for someone who is articulate and charismatic? Do you want someone who is highly regarded within pharmacy circles or who has a reputation beyond pharmacy?

All these are aspects of professional leadership, and this list is by no means exhaustive. Some pharmacists who are influential at a local level, or who move and shake in non-political pharmacy organisations, will be able to perform equally effectively on the national stage. Are you one of those or do you know one of them? How can you be persuaded to become involved with the boards?

The establishment of the national boards provides an opportunity for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians who previously might not have thought professional leadership was for them to consider becoming involved. With the development of new roles throughout the professions it is time to stand up and make a difference.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal