Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7422 p450
14 October 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· E-commerce
· EPS
· Pfizer products (3)
· Drug misuse
· Pharmacy ownership
· Statutory Committee
· The profession
· Superdrug
· Retention fee
· Job satisfaction


Letters to the Editor

Superdrug

Puzzled

From Mr D. R. K. Brown, MRPharmS

I wonder how many people were as puzzled as I was to receive a complimentary Superdrug “sick bag” with their PJ of 23 September.

Then, I read the small print and discovered that the bag was actually for a prospective employee to wear over his or her head as a disguise — a noble idea I am sure but, alas, only someone who has recently visited a head-shrinking witch doctor could have worn the one they sent me.

So I read on and was told that as an alternative I could have the bag filled with some Superdrug goodies. Again, great idea, but with my pygmy-sized bag I was not exactly overwhelmed by the company’s generosity.

Having decided that the bag might just be a gimmick, I wondered how many such bags had been produced and circulated, and how many trees must have been felled to carry out this hilarious wheeze.

The only conclusion I could come to was that Superdrug is neither a particularly generous nor environmentally friendly organisation, and that it is desperately head-hunting small-minded people to work for it — not really what I am looking for. I shall therefore retain my sick bag in case one of my children gets travel sick, and in the meantime hope that they do not cut out the eyes and mouth as instructed on the bag’s reverse.

Kyle Brown
Nuneaton, Warwickshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (The profession)
Next Topic (Retention fee)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal