Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7423 p493
21 October 2006


Society summary


Council gazettes first batch of Regulations that will succeed Byelaws

The Council of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, at the October Council meeting, approved the gazetting of a first batch of draft Regulations to succeed the Byelaws of the Society (see p498).

The Council was reminded that the Society was currently engaged in revoking the existing Byelaws made under the 1953 Charter and replacing them where appropriate with Regulations under the 2004 Charter. The work programme for this supersession of Byelaws with Regulations had already involved dealing with some sections individually. These had included the Regulations on election and appointment to the Council and on the establishment of the national pharmacy boards. The remaining Charter Byelaws had been grouped into batches for supersession, and the gazetted Regulations formed the first batch.

In preparing the Regulations, the Society’s general goal had been to keep to a minimum the amount of detail set out in Regulations and, so far as was appropriate, to capture the rest (for example, principles for ways of working) in protocols or guidelines, while avoiding improper subdelegation. Although this first batch did not need it, some of the Regulations in future batches would require the development of additional guidance. Once the text of these future Regulations was confirmed, the Society would be able to develop guidance to supplement them as appropriate.

(“Supersession” is the appropriate legal catch-all term to describe what is being done with the existing Byelaws, as it can be used to describe the removal of text that may or may be replaced by equivalent text elsewhere. For example, the current Byelaw section concerning the Common Seal is being revoked but roughly equivalent text can be found in the draft Regulations. However, the current Byelaw section on meetings for the reading of papers is now considered obsolete and so is not being replaced.)

The Council was advised that the Society has recently updated its system of numbering and nomenclature for the Regulations. The new Regulations sections will be numbered consecutively as they are made and reordered for narrative clarity when all the Byelaws under the 1953 Charter have been superseded.

Introducing the draft Regulations, the Society’s head of corporate governance, Christine Gray, commented on the Society’s general principle that when superseding Charter Byelaws with Regulations it should keep the enduring Regulations to a minimum and to supplement them where appropriate with guidance. She explained that this policy would give the Council flexibility to keep procedures up to date without having going to go through the full Privy Council approval procedures every time a change was required.

For this first batch, however, there was no question of additional guidance. The draft covered interpretation, the remuneration of auditors, the Society’s common seal, The Pharmaceutical Journal, the Society’s museum and the Council’s ability to produce codes, procedural protocols and guidance.

On the section concerned with The Pharmaceutical Journal, Mrs Gray said that it proposed no changes. There was no defined list of what was required to be published in The Journal, as opposed to what was published in accordance with custom and practice, and external legal advice suggested that it was not necessary for the Regulations to list exactly what was required to be published. The Journal would respond to the Council’s decisions as to what it wishes to have published.

With regard to the museum, there was a separate constitution for the museum that was approved by Council.

There would be further batches of Regulations that would need new guidance, but that was not applicable for this batch, which covered subjects that were thought to be relatively straightforward.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal