Home > PJ (current issue) > Leading article | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7425 p534
4 November 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 30K, Acrobat Reader

Leading Articles

Patient safety to the fore

Patient safety is flavour of the week: it runs through a number of stories we are covering. Arguably the simplest decision for pharmacists to make on the safety front is to undertake to talk to as many old people as they can next week about their medicines, in order to check that they understand why they are taking them and to sort out any problems they may be having. Why next week? It is the fourth Ask About Medicines Week (p542), and it focuses on the fact that although 80 per cent of the over-75s take at least one medicine, half of them do not take their medicines as intended.

Another aspect of safety we touch on is the potential danger to patients if they buy medicines via the internet and unwittingly use a website not connected with a registered pharmacy. The Royal Pharmaceutical Society is calling for online pharmacies to participate in piloting a logo that will click through to the Society’s website, allowing visitors to verify the registration details of the pharmacy and the pharmacist behind the site (p557).

Perhaps the only oversight this week has been by the National Patient Safety Agency. It has published a pledge entitled “A commitment to patient safety”, which has been signed by representatives of 28 medical and dental bodies.

The aims of the pledge are: to be recognised among the best and safest health services in the world; to ensure that patients receive the very best care possible and achieve the best outcomes; and to minimise the risk of harm to patients occurring as a consequence of health care. The 28 bodies also commit to recognising their leadership role in ensuring patient safety; incorporating patient safety into training and education programmes; creating an environment in which staff are able to report incidents openly and honestly without recrimination; and giving patients the information they need to contribute to their safety. All good stuff and equally relevant to anyone working in the health service.

What a pity, then, that the NPSA restricted circulation of this document to doctors and dentists. When asked why other bodies, such as the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, had not been asked to sign the pledge, an NPSA spokeswoman said: “This project has been taken forward with the institutions represented on the NPSA’s medical advisory panel. Everyone involved in health care has a part to play in patient safety and we welcome a commitment by other professions.”

Patient safety can only be tackled if all health professionals involved in the direct care of patients are equally committed to the same aims and are recognised as equal partners in raising standards. With nearly 10 per cent of incidents and errors notified to the NPSA itself to do with medicines (p535), the NPSA’s elitism does nobody any favours — least of all patients.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal