Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7425 p544
4 November 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Supermarket pharmacy
· Pfizer products (2)
· Professional image
· Paracetamol
· Varicella
· Psychotropic medicines
· Dispensing


Letters to the Editor

Supermarket pharmacy

Position regarding alcohol sales

From Mr K. M. J. Tull, MRPharmS

I received a telephone call recently from a locum who wanted to clarify the position of sales of alcohol through a pharmacy till in a supermarket. The manager of the store was insisting that alcohol be sold through the pharmacy till to aid congestion at the other tills. The locum deemed this not to be professional and rightly questioned the order. I told him my version of what I have instilled in my pharmacy operation, which is that the alcohol licence is held by the store manager for the store. However the pharmacy is a registered premises within that store and thus the tills are registered to the pharmacy premises. Therefore, the pharmacy does not possess an alcohol licence and may not, therefore, put alcohol through its tills. This argument seems logical to me. I also stated that I do not deal with fresh meat or fish products either as this could contaminate my pharmacy area.

On further investigation of “Medicines, ethics and practice” (no 30, July 2006), I could only find a reference to alcohol sales in “Part 3, Service Specifications, Stock” (p93), which stated the following: “Pharmacists must not purchase for sale on registered pharmacy premises any product which may be injurious to public health or bring the profession into disrepute. This includes tobacco products other than nicotine replacement therapies, alcohol and products intended to mask signs of alcohol or drug addiction.”

Unfortunately this statement is flawed when applied to a supermarket pharmacy because the pharmacy has not bought the alcohol but is being forced to sell it on their premises. I can see that the above statement has been written with the correct intent of restricting alcohol sales from a pharmacy but it only applies if the pharmacy buys the alcohol in the first place. Therefore there is a loophole that needs to be closed rapidly. I would be grateful for advice on the correct procedure for dealing with such sales.

J. Tull
Secretary
Herefordshire Local Pharmaceutical Committee

 

LYNSEY BALMER, head of professional ethics, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, replies:

As Mr Tull highlights, the Code of Ethics and Standards states that pharmacists must not purchase for sale on registered pharmacy premises any products, such as alcohol, which may be injurious to health or bring the profession into disrepute. In stating that pharmacists must not purchase alcohol to sell on registered premises, it is intended that alcohol should therefore not be sold from registered pharmacy premises. A view that it is ethical to sell alcohol from registered premises, provided the alcohol has not actually been purchased for sale from the premises by a pharmacist, is contrary to the spirit of the Code of Ethics requirement. The Code of Ethics and Standards is currently being reviewed and the requirements relating to the sale of alcohol from registered pharmacy premises will be considered as part of the review process.

Any pharmacist who assumes responsibility for a pharmacy premises, whether as an employee, locum or otherwise, is professionally accountable for overseeing the activities carried out from that premises while he or she is in control. When assuming this responsibility, a pharmacist is expected to use his or her professional judgement to determine whether a transaction should proceed and must be prepared to justify their decision. Pharmacy owners and superintendent pharmacists have a professional responsibility to ensure the observance of all legal and professional requirements in relation to pharmaceutical aspects of the business, and must not seek to impose conditions on pharmacists which may adversely affect their ability to comply with their professional and legal duties. If a pharmacist is being pressured by a non-pharmacist member of the management team to take a course of action that he or she does not believe to be appropriate, the pharmacist should in the first instance confer with the area or regional pharmacy manager or superintendent pharmacist, or both.

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Pfizer products)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal