Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7426 p572
11 November 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Pharmacy in Spain
· Controlled drugs
· Community pharmacy
· Prescribing
· Medicines use reviews
· Safety (2)
· Supermarket pharmacy
· The profession (4)
· The Council
· Statutory Committee
· Retention fee
· Section 60 Order
· The Society
· Pfizer products


Letters to the Editor

Medicines use reviews

Killing two birds with one stone

From Dr S. Rudland and Ms R. K. Parmer, MRPharmS

Within our practice we are aware of documentation coming back from local pharmacists relating to medicines use reviews carried out with our patients. These have contained helpful comments about compliance and prescribing. These comments often need acting on, which creates additional work for the GP team.

Conversely, there are occasions when the advice is not helpful, through no fault of the pharmacist, because they do not have the whole patient record at their disposal or a full understanding regarding the decision-making that went into the prescribing in the first place.

We pondered over how to address this problem and realised there was one possible solution for the two problems.

At StowHealth we run a long-term medical conditions (LTMC) clinic where we draw on a multidisciplinary team to see patients with multiple conditions once or twice a year rather than bringing them back separately for each of their conditions.

Patients with high blood pressure, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, left ventricular dysfunction, a history of stroke and also those with diabetes are called to our LTMC clinic. They will initially see a health care assistant who will do blood tests and an initial preliminary measurement. The patient’s blood tests will be reviewed by their own registered doctor who will electronically tag their record with any recommendations.

When the patient then returns to the clinic about two weeks after the initial contact they are seen by one of our practice nurses working in conjunction with a doctor. This, we thought, would be the ideal time to review prescribing.

So the solution to the two problems was to invite a local pharmacist from Boots The Chemists to come and work with the LTMC team so that patients could see the pharmacist at the time of their visit to the practice.

The pharmacist is able to access the doctor and our medical records while conducting medicines use reviews. This team work makes it easier for the pharmacist to give effective and appropriate advice, and creates an opportunity to action the advice straight away.

This pilot project has been well received by our patients and it certainly provides us with an opportunity to have a sense of working more closely with our local pharmacist. We plan to assess the success of the project formally by sampling patients’ views and hope to make a comparison with the more usual medicines review setup where access to the patient’s GP record and access to the patient’s GP is not so readily available.

Simon Rudland
Executive Partner
StowHealth


Roshan Kaur Parmer
Pharmacist
Boots The Chemists,
Stowmarket, Suffolk

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Prescribing)
Next Topic (Safety)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal