Home > PJ (Current issue) > Meetings | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7426 p587
11 November 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 30K, Acrobat Reader

Meetings

See Reports

UK Psychiatric Pharmacy Group

Over 200 pharmacists and technicians met recently to discuss expanding the boundaries of mental health pharmacy. Dawn Price reports

The 31st annual (13th international) Psychiatric Pharmacy Conference was organised by the United Kingdom Psychiatric Pharmacy Group. It took place in Reading, Berkshire, from October 6 to 8.

Developments in adult ADHD treatment

New services in mental health

Is NICE too restrictive in the mental health medicines field?

A patient’s view — learning to manage bipolar disorder

Developments in adult ADHD treatment

Current developments in adult attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder were described by Gordon Bates, a child and adolescent psychiatrist responsible for the regional ADHD clinic at Birmingham Children’s Hospital and senior lecturer at the universities of Birmingham and Warwick.

There have been developments in the recognition and treatment of “adult ADHD”, he said, which are that a lower treatment effect of stimulants is seen with standard doses and a better effect observed with higher doses. Furthermore, atomoxetine, tricyclic antidepressants and buproprion are useful alternatives to stimulants.

He also touched on the recent changes in Controlled Drugs management with reference to the removal of handwriting requirements for S2 and S3 drugs. He suggested that this has had a positive impact on service improvement allowing more automation of repeat prescriptions. Future management and development options for adult ADHD were also discussed, including treatment with long-acting dexamphetamine and modafanil.

Learning difficulties

Dave Branford, chief pharmacist, South Derbyshire Mental Health Trust, gave a comprehensive therapeutic update in learning difficulties (LD). He described challenging behaviour problems and suggested that drugs used to treat behavioural problems are treated like psychotropic drugs, ie, that they are used within co-ordinated care plans striving for lowest optimal doses, that side effects are monitored using rating instruments and that reviews are systematically and regularly performed. However, he also stressed the need to avoid intra-class polypharmacy and frequent drug and dose changes.

Priscilla Reed, a speech and language therapist from Lancashire, continued the learning disabilities theme by considering communication issues. Particular problems that medical professionals come across among people with learning disabilities include decision-making and hearing. She told the meeting that accessible materials which may enhance the understanding and retention of information in this group of individuals are available on various websites, including www.mencap.org.uk, www.easyinfo.org.uk, and www.askaboutmedicines.org.


New services in mental health

Four pharmacists described their research and other practice developments to the meeting.

Ciara Hallows, from Birmingham, presented her research on producing British Sign Language drug information resources on psychotropic drugs for deaf service users. She showed a video clip of a risperidone information resource, with simultaneous British Sign Language, oral and visual explanations. As a result of the popularity of the resources, Ms Hallows advised the meeting that the facility is being progressed for potential national distribution.

Wendy Broderick, associate director of pharmacy, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust, spoke on “Getting into bed with the private sector”. She outlined the trials and tribulations in adopting an innovative approach to outsourcing of medicines supply for a secondary care mental health unit to a multinational corporation. The greatest challenges were around changing the concept of mental health pharmacy and dissolution of service level agreements with acute trust providers. She said that public-private partnership is her trust’s direction of travel and that this model fits within the Department of Health objectives.

Suzanne Robinson, from the Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, outlined her experience as a non-medical prescriber in practice. She looked at where supplementary prescribing fits in a mental health service and suggested acute episodes of depression and treatment-resistant schizophrenia were suitable candidates. She also described the challenges met in setting up this new role.

Stephen Bazire, chief pharmacist, Norfolk and Waveney Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, and honorary professor at the School of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, described the implementation of an automated dispensing machine at his hospital. He said that the advantage of an automated tablet counting machine for mental health service providers lie in the ability to produce individualised patient medicines sachets in biodegradable strips. This allows complete flexibility in supplies, he said. He described the planning, implementation and roll-out process for his hospital’s automated system and highlighted the challenges met along the way. These included “deblistering” of medicines from patient packs and interfacing with the pharmacy computer system.


Is NICE too restrictive in the mental health medicines field?

The conference debate embraced the controversial theme of whether the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence is too restrictive in the field of mental health practice.

The debate centred around the provocative house belief that NICE guidance is too evidence-based and pays too little attention to clinical experience. Before the debate an informal vote suggested that the opinion of the delegates was predominantly against NICE.

Roger Bullock, clinical lead in old age psychiatry, Avon and Wiltshire, and director of the Kingshill Research Centre, spoke for the motion. He suggested that people with free minds were like “Dr Who” characters, and those that followed NICE guidelines were like “cybermen”.

Speaking against the motion, Steve Pilling, consultant clinical psychologist and co-director of the National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, defended NICE by pointing out that it took a lot of care with its guidance and took the time to evaluate the evidence in a robust way.

Following the presentations, the informal vote shifted to a more balanced view on NICE’s worth.


A patient’s view — learning to manage bipolar disorder

Mark Harnden was diagnosed with bipolar disorder in 1995. He presented a talk entitled “Madness, medication, empowerment and the person” to the meeting.

He described his experiences of psychosis, the side effects of medication and a five-year battle to accept his bipolar illness. He outlined his management programme, which provided a comprehensive understanding of the concepts involved in learning to self-manage extreme mood swings and went on to describe getting his life back on track. He described his experiences as “11 bizarre years” and told the meeting that he is thankful to have persevered with all the professionals with whom he came into contact.

Correction
At the UK Psychiatric Pharmacy Group meeting Mark Harnden said that he was glad the professionals with whom he came into contact had persevered with him, rather than that he was grateful that he had persevered with the professionals.


©The Pharmaceutical Journal