Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 277 No 7427 p597
18 November 2006

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Pharmacy care programme cuts blood pressure in over-65s

A pharmacy care programme can lead to better adherence to medication and improvements in blood pressure and cholesterol measures for patients over the age of 65 years, a study published online this week suggests (JAMA, 13 November 2006).

The US study involved 200 patients who participated in a two-month run-in observational phase followed by a six-month intervention, consisting of standardised medicines education, regular follow-up by pharmacists and dispensing in monitored dosage systems. Following the intervention phase, patients were randomised to continue with the pharmacy care programme or revert back to “usual care” for an additional six months. Participants were taking an average of nine long-term medicines.

Compared with the observational period, patients experienced improved adherence to medication (61.2 per cent to 96.9 per cent; P<0.001), reductions in systolic blood pressure (133.2mmHg to 129.9mmHg; P=0.02) and reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (91.7mg/dl to 86.8mg/dl; P=0.001) by the end of the intervention period.

At the end of the randomisation period, patients receiving usual care had lower adherence than those remaining on the pharmacy programme (69.1 per cent versus 95.5 per cent; P<0.001). Systolic blood pressure was improved in the pharmacy group compared with the usual care group at the end of the six-month comparison. However, no significant difference was seen for cholesterol levels.

In an editorial (ibid), Ross Simpson, Jr, from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, discusses the study’s limitations. He says: “Because the usual care group was the reference group, the two groups in the randomised trial phase of the study had different levels of observation and different frequency of visits to the health facility after randomisation, and patients in the usual care group had an intervention that they had been receiving for six months removed. … [This introduced] a potential observation bias that favoured the intervention group, especially because adherence is a behaviour and observing a behaviour influences the behaviour.”

Alaster Rutherford, head of medicines management at Bristol Primary Care Trust, commented on the study: “I think it is hugely important for the development of community pharmacy service in the UK. The next step from medicines use reviews should be for concordance packages linked to specific medication regimens — this is generalisable research and the profession needs to emphasis this potentially significant contribution to public health.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal